Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (452695)	1/30/2009 10:55:25 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1574811

The math not adding up, is not minutia. If the male and female percentages don't fit with the overall percentage, the whole study, or at least the presentation of it they made available and you linked to, is worthless. "For the overall rates to correspond to the male and female rates, the veteran pool would have to be 62% to 64% female, and the non veteran pool would have to be about 66% female. " volokh.com Only 7% of veterans are female. The general population only has a very small majority of females. They could be using a distorted sample, but that itself would be a weakness in the study. As for the male only study see junkscience.com