SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorne who wrote (58368)2/1/2009 10:34:08 AM
From: SGJ2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224757
 
This sounds like a lot of fiction to me lorne. China is in the bull eye because ironically, they are now the biggest capitalists at the table. Showcasing them as evil greed doers, dressing too fancy, throwing tantrums at those who dare speak against them, or the worst sin of all?:

There is no question that Beijing has pursued a mercantilist strategy of conquering US and European markets by holding down the yuan/renminbi.

How is this a benefit to the Chinese? Describing capitalism in terms of a host/parasite paradigm smacks of socialist propaganda. Capitalists fill demand. They don't fill demand and try to kill it off at the same time.

As far as the Chinese holding down thier currency, there is no proof to this. No one can pinpoint how the Chinese Central Bank would accomplish it. Central Banks have tried in the past and failed. They don't waste their time anymore.

It has a monthly trade surplus of $40bn, the highest ever recorded by any country. Or put another way, China is exporting its surplus capacity to the rest of the world. It has become a global deflation machine.

Consumers everywhere rejoice in low prices. Worldwide consumers got what they wanted, at a low price. China got rich. What's the problem?

skipping over the role of Asia in stoking a credit bubble (Takes two to tango).

Providing goods to fill demand is somehow complicit in creating the RE credit bubble? Huh? You sell a carton of widgets to a regular customer. Unbeknownst to you, he pays from funds obtained from a bank robbery and you are an accomplice? More twisted leftist thinking.

The IMF's chief economist Olivier Blanchard said it was unwise to "obsess" over the exchange rate in this fragile climate. "It is probably not the right time to focus on the Chinese exchange rate, given that it is not a central element of the world crisis. There are many other things we should be thinking about. It is an item on the list, but it is not at the top of the list."

True, far,far down and then the focus is to find out its still a waste of time.

Stephen Roach, head of Morgan Stanley Asia, offered a harsher verdict, calling it pure folly to pick a fight with Beijing.

Folly is the calling card of the ONE as demostrated by his actions during his brief time in office. Change we need, remember? This is where the concern should be. He is driving us off a cliff.

He pleaded with the West not to retreat into protectionism. Washington - and above all Capitol Hill -- would be well advised to listen.

Comes up with a reasonable conclusion contradicting the apparent prejudice he exhibited in the body of his article. Weird.

I doubt the ONE is going to take any advice like this though. He was a community organizer and campaigned for president for two years, he knows everything about everything.