SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (453038)2/1/2009 2:18:56 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575189
 
RW, > 'Cause they don't pay adequate property taxes.

CA spending almost doubled over the past 10 years. Compare that w/ federal spending which went up 71% over the same period, and CA didn't have to pay for two wars. Even under Ah-nuld, spending went up 30-40% (can't find exact figures, that's just from memory).

If we repeal Prop. 13 now, the ones who will be impacted are those who've been living in the same house for over 6 years. That might get some rich people, but that will also get a LOT of lower middle class people.

Ah-nuld said it best. CA doesn't have a revenue problem. CA has a spending problem. (This was before the problem got too big for just spending cuts alone.)

Tenchusatsu



To: Road Walker who wrote (453038)2/1/2009 2:34:04 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575189
 
What the fuqq are you talking about? We pay a LOT of property taxes in San Diego. Unlike FL we also pay state income taxes.

Taro



To: Road Walker who wrote (453038)2/1/2009 11:02:08 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575189
 
>'Cause they don't pay adequate property taxes.

Also because of the 2/3 budget rule.

-Z