Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (181209)	2/2/2009 2:04:36 PM
From: John Chen	Respond to of 306849

" I think she needs help" Lizzie, lizzie. I think you need help.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (181209)	2/2/2009 2:15:23 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

OT But for the hospital, this is no different than keeping somebody alive with an artificial heart. not even CLOSE.... what is it about 'elective' procedure that you don't understand she already had a brood of 6 kids 50 years old the terminal point for you for transplants? using that standard steve jobs wouldn't qualify for a pancreatic transplant, he's 53 Hospitals do this all the time. BS...hospitals are able to set guidelines on the criteria for acceptable recipients for transplants, not the least of which is age.... UCLA has age 55 for pancreatic transplants as the limit, with anything over that done on a case by case basis i know 50 year olds who can run rings around some of the video and computer addicted 20 somethings....for some 50 is indeed the new 40 you're creating a red herring anyway, the point is in vitro fertilization SHOULD be considered elective, and imo, should not be covered by insurance or medicaid....only 14 states MANDATE fertility coverage, CA of course being one this is my last post on this topic here, its getting far afield , although not entirely...my original post of karl's essay on the topic says it all