Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (78898)	2/2/2009 7:24:12 PM
From: geode00	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Lush Limpsnot tells his listeners to not think about an issue themselves but wait until he tells them how to think about it. How does this admitted liar, drug-addict and all around fat slob keep his audience? Learned helplessness runs rampant in the right wing.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (78898)	2/3/2009 12:22:25 PM
From: Crimson Ghost	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Judd Gregg's Plan To Destroy Social Security Posted: 02 Feb 2009 04:19 PM CST New Hampshire Republican Senator Judd Gregg is one of the leading candidates to become Commerce Secretary, if not the leading candidate. If he were to become Commerce Secretary, the Democratic Governor of New Hampshire would appoint a Republican a replace his seat. So, for some reason, in the wake of total Republican intransigence on the stimulus bill, the Obama administration will respond by putting a Republican in charge of one the federal departments overseeing the economy. Judd Gregg himself has said he will oppose the stimulus package. That is certainly an, um, interesting way for the Obama administration to incentivize Republican opposition. Oppose President Obama, and he will reward you by giving you a cabinet position. It is worth noting what sort of ideas Judd Gregg has for the economy: a commission of center-right insiders operating in secret and circumventing Congress in order to destroy Social Security and Medicare. More in the extended entry. Judd Gregg, and the currently anti-stimulus Democrat Kent Conrad, both of whom voted to set $700 billion on fire, are pushing to redirect the blaze to Social Security and health care: Revamping entitlement programs and the tax code would be a stunningly ambitious undertaking. Former presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tried and failed to overhaul the nation's retirement and health-care systems; the U.S. tax code hasn't been refurbished since Ronald Reagan was in office in 1986. But lawmakers said the soaring deficit is finally helping forge a consensus for action. "I want a process that leads us to a conclusion this year," said Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee and an outspoken deficit hawk. "It's essential that we do this now." At the moment, discussions are focused on whether to name a special panel to make the difficult decisions that would be required to right the nation's finances. Key senators in both parties are backing a plan put forward by Conrad and the Budget Committee's senior Republican, Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.), that would create a task force of lawmakers and administration officials. The task force would wrestle with the details of Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare and the tax code, and deliver a reform plan to Congress for a vote later this year. Under the proposal, the task force's recommendations could not be amended; the House and Senate would be required to accept or reject them without changes or additions, similar to the process lawmakers use to close military bases. The House and the Senate can't amend this super-constitutional task force, eh? That sounds like a democratic process. I'm sure the Villagers on the commission would be responsive to the needs of the population at large, given their recent behavior. Fortunately, both Speaker Pelosi and President Obama oppose this plan, according to the same article I linked above. So, we are unlikely to be subjected to such an atrocrity. However, it still speaks volumes about who President Obama appears ready to make Commerce Secretary, and without any benefit of having 60 Senators. If you can think of a reason why this is a good thing, please let me know in the comments. Open Left