Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (69197)	2/3/2009 3:53:56 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Rendition is suddenly acceptable Betsy's Page The Los Angeles Times reported yesterday that the Obama administration was maintaining rendition as a tool to deal with terrorists. <<< Under executive orders issued by Obama recently, the CIA still has authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States. Current and former U.S. intelligence officials said that the rendition program might be poised to play an expanded role going forward because it was the main remaining mechanism -- aside from Predator missile strikes -- for taking suspected terrorists off the street. >>> They've decided that renditions are a tool that they just can't do without in their battles against terrorism. <<< One provision in one of Obama’s orders appears to preserve the CIA's ability to detain and interrogate terrorism suspects as long as they are not held long-term. The little-noticed provision states that the instructions to close the CIA's secret prison sites "do not refer to facilities used only to hold people on a short-term, transitory basis." Despite concern about rendition, Obama's prohibition of many other counter-terrorism tools could prompt intelligence officers to resort more frequently to the "transitory" technique. >>> I wonder how long "transitory" will turn out to be. I don't have any problem with this decision, but do note the hypocrisy of human rights advocates who suddenly don't have a problem with rendition when it is Obama's CIA doing it and not Bush's. Darren Hutchinson blogging at Dissenting Justice points out how Human Rights Watch has changed its rhetoric. Back in April, this is what Human Rights Watch had to say about rendition. <<< The US government should: Repudiate the use of rendition to torture as a counterterrorism tactic and permanently discontinue the CIA's rendition program; Disclose the identities, fate, and current whereabouts of all persons detained by the CIA or rendered to foreign custody by the CIA since 2001, including detainees who were rendered to Jordan; Repudiate the use of "diplomatic assurances" against torture and ill-treatment as a justification for the transfer of a suspect to a place where he or she is at risk of such abuse; Make public any audio recordings or videotapes that the CIA possesses of interrogations of detainees rendered by the CIA to foreign custody; Provide appropriate compensation to all persons arbitrarily detained by the CIA or rendered to foreign custody.... Refuse to cooperate in secret detention and rendition efforts, and disclose all information about past cooperation in such efforts >>> This is what they are saying today. <<< "Under limited circumstances, there is a legitimate place" for renditions, said Tom Malinowski, the Washington advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. "What I heard loud and clear from the president's order was that they want to design a system that doesn't result in people being sent to foreign dungeons to be tortured -- but that designing that system is going to take some time." Malinowski said he had urged the Obama administration to stipulate that prisoners could be transferred only to countries where they would be guaranteed a public hearing in an official court. "Producing a prisoner before a real court is a key safeguard against torture, abuse and disappearance," Malinowski said. >>> How values change when the administration changes in the White House. betsyspage.blogspot.com