Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: studdog who wrote (11729)	2/4/2009 12:23:56 AM
From: Little Joe	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

Evolution is generally accepted as a proven theory in the scientific community. The case for Global Warming has been made politically but not scientifically. I wonder why? lj

To: studdog who wrote (11729)	2/4/2009 1:06:43 AM
From: Oblomov	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

On the contrary, the anthropogenic global warming movement is much like Lamarckism in the early 20th century. Despite countervailing evidence (such as the simultaneous warming of Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, Triton, etc), global warming enthusiasts insist upon draconian policy that only recognizes a human cause of climate change. But the goal of the policy is redistribution of wealth, not reduction of greenhouse gasses; otherwise, why would they exempt China, India, Brazil, and all of Africa from the emissions caps? Likewise, eventually Lamarckism became the basis for the Soviet agricultural policy, to disastrous effect. It seems that the Ukranian wheat was mired in its petit bourgeois false consciousness, and refused to help the revolution.