SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frankly Speaking who wrote (63280)2/4/2009 9:27:30 AM
From: E. Charters  Respond to of 78419
 
Bell says: (It appears a lot of stuff you used to see on balance sheets it not GAAP as in:

We use EBITDA, among other measures, to assess the operating performance of our ongoing businesses without the effects of amortization expense, net benefit plans cost, and restructuring and other items. We exclude these items because they affect the comparability of our financial results and could potentially distort the analysis of trends in business performance. We exclude amortization expense and net benefit plans cost because they largely depend on the accounting methods and assumptions a company uses, as well as non-operating factors such as the historical cost of capital assets and the fund performance of a company’s pension plans. Excluding restructuring and other items does not imply they are necessarily non-recurring.

EBITDA allows us to compare our operating performance on a consistent basis. We believe that certain investors and analysts use EBITDA to measure a company’s ability to service debt and to meet other payment obligations, or as a common measurement to value companies in the telecommunications industry.

The most comparable Canadian GAAP financial measure is operating income. The following tables are reconciliations of operating income to EBITDA on a consolidated basis for BCE and Bell Canada.


BCE
2006 2005

Operating income
3,332 3,759

Amortization expense
3,129 3,061

Net benefit plans cost
513 359

Restructuring and other items
355 55

EBITDA
7,329 7,234

BELL CANADA
2006 2005

Operating income
3,353 3,755

Amortization expense
3,073 2,989

Net benefit plans cost
531 389

Restructuring and other items
332 54

EBITDA
7,289 7,187


operating income before restructuring and other items

The term operating income before restructuring and other items does not have any standardized meaning according to Canadian GAAP. It is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

We use operating income before restructuring and other items, among other measures, to assess the operating performance of our ongoing businesses without the effects of restructuring and other items. We exclude these items because they affect the comparability of our financial results and could potentially distort the analysis of trends in business performance. Excluding restructuring and other items does not imply they are necessarily non-recurring.

The most comparable Canadian GAAP financial measure is operating income. The following tables are reconciliations of operating income to operating income before restructuring and other items on a consolidated basis for BCE and Bell Canada.


BCE
2006 2005

Operating income
3,332 3,759

Restructuring and other items
355 55

Operating income before restructuring and other items
3,687 3,814

BELL CANADA
2006 2005

Operating income
3,353 3,755

Restructuring and other items
332 54

Operating income before restructuring and other items
3,685 3,809

net earnings before restructuring and other items, net gains on investments, and costs incurred to form bell aliant

The term net earnings before restructuring and other items, net gains on investments, and costs incurred to form Bell Aliant does not have any standardized meaning according to Canadian GAAP. It is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

We use net earnings before restructuring and other items, net gains on investments and costs incurred to form Bell Aliant, among other measures, to assess the operating performance of our ongoing businesses without the effects of restructuring and other items, net gains on investments and costs incurred to form Bell Aliant. We exclude these items because they affect the comparability of our financial results and could potentially distort the analysis of trends in business performance. Excluding these items does not imply they are necessarily non-recurring.

The most comparable Canadian GAAP financial measure is net earnings applicable to common shares. The following table is a reconciliation of net earnings applicable to common shares to net earnings before restructuring and other items, net gains on investments and costs incurred to form Bell Aliant on a consolidated basis and per BCE Inc. common share.

2006 2005

TOTAL PER SHARE TOTAL PER SHARE


Net earnings applicable to common shares
1,937 2.25 1,891 2.04

Restructuring and other items (1)
222 0.26 37 0.04

Net gains on investments (2)
(525) (0.61) (27) (0.03)

Other costs incurred to form Bell Aliant (3)
42 0.05 – –

Net earnings before restructuring and other items, net gains on investments, and costs incurred to form Bell Aliant

1,676 1.95 1,901 2.05


(1) Includes transaction costs associated with the formation of Bell Aliant. These costs relate mainly to investment banking, professional and consulting fees. In 2006, we incurred $138 million ($77 million after tax and non-controlling interest).
(2) Amounts for 2006 include the recognition of a future tax asset of $434 million, representing the tax-effected amount of approximately $2,341 million of previously unrecognized capital loss carryforwards as realization of the loss carryforwards now is more likely than not due to the anticipated gain on the sale of Telesat.
(3) Includes premium costs incurred by Bell Aliant on early redemption of long-term debt as a result of the formation of Bell Aliant. In 2006, we incurred $122 million ($42 million after tax and non-controlling interest).
free cash flow

The term free cash flow does not have any standardized meaning according to Canadian GAAP. It is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

We consider free cash flow to be an important indicator of the financial strength and performance of our business because it shows how much cash is available to repay debt and reinvest in our company. We present free cash flow consistently from period to period, which allows us to compare our financial performance on a consistent basis.

We believe that certain investors and analysts use free cash flow to value a business and its underlying assets.

The most comparable Canadian GAAP financial measure is cash from operating activities. The following table is a reconciliation of cash from operating activities to free cash flow on a consolidated basis.



2006 2005


Cash from operating activities
5,389 5,337

Capital expenditures
(3,133) (3,357)

Total dividends paid
(1,546) (1,450)

Other investing activities
(2) 39


Free cash flow
708 569


EC<:-}



To: Frankly Speaking who wrote (63280)2/4/2009 7:46:44 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78419
 
Imagine what sound a net frog makes.

RIBIT!

Reduced Income Before Interest and Taxes.