Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (63281)	2/4/2009 9:35:24 AM
From: tyc:>	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 78419

>>"In other words they drilled say 100,000 ounces, and recovered 200,000." That was an interesting essay EC. Am I right i thinking that the cutting of drilling assays is to eliminate the nugget influence from the drilling results ? A mine in the Timmins area that i am watching has cut their drilling grades, but are now embarking on an underground bulk sampling. Perhaps this procedure is to establish what grades can really be expected.... how much nuggeting is there in reality ? All this work and expense ! Is it all necessary ? I guess your Cololmac story suggests that without it there is risk and doubt ? I still believe that our conservative government has ignored a great opportunity to stimulate our economy by re-establishing depletion allowances and also the tax free period for mining startups. Any comment form conservative EC ?