Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (453988)	2/4/2009 9:48:03 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572295

You are very naive if you think US doesnt have interests in both places. I would agree that over time we need to remove our troops from europe and korea but you cant incent NK with nukes and the ability to overrun the border to go for it if the US withdrawls. Yuh think they will believe the US will nuke them if they attack? I doubt it--after all you would be the first to decry using nukes even if treaties involved. So if you want peacea and there is no sub for american power, we need to keep assets in place. What i do think we should do is make the folks we are helping pay the costs. PS do you think putin without US presence and with the energy weapon wouldnt become dominant in europe? You think we shouldnt care about that either? Unlike some of the others, you know what isolationism can mean. We should be more prudent for sure but bugging out everywhere and anywhere, nope.