SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Mining News of Note -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LoneClone who wrote (32163)2/4/2009 10:34:02 AM
From: LoneClone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 193918
 
Gold, silver breakout watch: Got Gold Report
2/2/2009 1:53:27 PM | Gene Arensberg

stockhouse.com

Silver could be the investment opportunity of this generation

Atlanta -- This is actually an “off” week for the Got Gold Report. Normally off weeks are spent catching up on the various companies this report follows and recharging the batteries, but since both gold and silver are at pretty important technical levels below is a quick update on some of the indicators. This supplemental report is also a way to get the updated charts to the readership. See the chart links at the bottom for those.

First, though, just a few comments about the very small silver market; small relative to gold, that is. A few fundamental drivers concerning silver that haven’t been mentioned lately but need to be remembered as a foundation for its investors. These are merely a few of the many bullet points. We’ve discussed them at length in previous reports, but it helps to consider them in the context of all the economic fear that has been worrying the markets lately.

Now that all the fair weather jump-on-the-bandwagon-late gold and silver investors have been run out of town by the worst gold/silver correction sheriff ever; now that the markets have turned formerly rank and cocky bulls into meek, fearful, quick-on-the-sell-trigger sausage meat, perhaps it’s time for gold and silver to give everyone a taste of what they are capable of. Perhaps but, as always, never, ever consider trading either futures or ETFs on a short-term basis without either “insurance” (options to offset unexpected adverse movement) or carefully selected and constantly managed trailing stops.

Fear can change one’s focus. Fear can cause “fundamental amnesia.” Fear can make one forget all about why they chose one investment or another. It shouldn’t, but it can. The comments mentioned below are a few of the points to remember the next time silver hits the skids and fear rises to the fore.

Silver is cheap, cheap

Gold has already made new all time highs in U.S. dollars (last March), but silver never really came close. That’s particularly odd given that the world really doesn’t possess all that much above ground silver to spread among all its inhabitants.

Indeed, when silver cut its all time nominal high in U.S. dollars near $50 in 1980, the best estimates are there was close to double the amount of silver available then, some 29 years ago last week, compared to now. Some very popular silver analysts suggest that there is an even larger difference; they say that there is even less than half the silver metal available now, but 100% more silver in 1980, or rather, 50% less metal now seems like a safe assumption given sovereign dishoarding and a continued production-to-consumption deficit since then. Let’s go with half the silver today available than in 1980. If wrong, it’s on the high side, not the other way around.

In 1980, the world population was about 4.43 billion souls, more or less. World population in 2008 was estimated at 6.7 billion, up 2.27 billion or about 51.24% higher than then.

According to Dollardaze.org, in 1980 there was on the order of the equivalent of $6 trillion of global money supply in all currencies in all forms. By late 2008 global fiat money supply had ballooned to $60 trillion U.S. dollars worth of all global money supply. That’s an increase of $54 trillion or about 900%.

In 1980, there was no such thing as a silver ETF. Virtually all the action was contained in the OTC markets, the futures markets and in physical metal through a wide array of private dealers. For ordinary investors and large institutional investors alike it was not as easy to trade silver in 1980 as it is today.

Let’s sum up just this much so far. Today versus 1980 we have globally 51% more humans using 900% more “dollars” to chase 50% less silver in a world where any one of those individuals can use a cell phone or a mouse click to buy silver via an ETF in seconds. Oh, one can still buy futures, or physical silver from your local dealer too, but the point is there are many more options to gain exposure to the silver market available today. So when silver does catch on it can do so like never before.

Silver, scarce now and getting scarcer

Despite this, silver “only” managed to achieve about 40% of its $50 all time nominal 1980 high last March, while its more popular cousin, gold, eclipsed its 1980 peak of $850 by 21.6% to $1,034 as the Lehman news was surfacing. That fact alone tells us something interesting. It tells us this bull market for gold and silver is still young. At least I think so.

Sure, the 1980 peak for silver was a mania event driven by an attempted speculative corner by the Hunt brothers and the Arabs, but both gold and silver were involved long before the peak and silver maintained a price of $16 for over a year on either side of that blow-off top.

Not incidentally, $16 in 1980 dollars is the equivalent of $42 in 2008 dollars. Silver would have to advance 230% from its Friday $12.66 cash market close just to equal silver’s lower range in 1980 in real terms. Silver would have to rise to $131 to equal its real 1980 silver mania purchasing power peak.

Just because silver hasn’t yet caught on with the masses yet doesn’t mean it never will. If the extremely high premiums for the real deal silver metal on the street and metal additions to silver ETFs are any guide, it’s already growing in popularity strongly. Let’s stop right here and hit one pretty important, but largely overlooked point about the silver price.

The action on the COMEX, division of NYMEX in New York largely “sets” the spot price of silver. In a perfect and orderly market there would be a kind of balance between buyers and sellers. However, in July of last year something went very wrong with the COMEX market for silver. Some of the largest of the largest of traders literally went belly up. The market was artificially disrupted. We’ll leave the government intervention into the markets for gold, silver and oil in July for another time, but that set off a cascade effect that smashed the commodities markets and eliminated some of those really big, overly leveraged traders for good.

That set up a rare condition of near total advantage for one side of the market. The short side, or the side that profits when prices fall. Other traders were forced by the panic action to dump long positions in a selling frenzy to raise precious cash. The market was in pure panic by October. That allowed short sellers, dominated by just two very large bullion banks, to mercilessly press their advantage through overly large net short positions in silver futures into a vacuum of little speculative buying pressure. So, the figurative perfect storm arrived for silver in July and the eye of that speculator-deadly hurricane crossed the New York coastline in November.

With the demise of so much of the trading action on the futures markets, prices were driven down to absurdly low levels. This report firmly believes that without the very unusual circumstance of so much upheaval in the composition of the balance of traders, there is no way that silver would have been forced down to an $8 handle in October and November.

I think it is terribly interesting that throughout the crisis the real physical silver market consistently showed very, very high premiums (as high as 50% for some silver products). Premiums are the amount paid or charged by dealers over the spot or cash price of the metal.

As prices on spot futures markets plunged, they did so with a commodity that was extremely scarce for the general public. Although I am not certain, the July to October plunge of 50% for silver may be the first time a commodity spot price has been cut in half in the midst of a physical shortage of that commodity. If it has ever happened before it is extremely rare. Price collapses for commodities in shortage are and will always be unsustainable for any length of time. Anomalies will occur from time to time (we just lived through one), but the laws of supply-demand-liquidity will ultimately prevail over time, every single time.

Silver, opportunity of this generation

During a financial sector crisis and panic, then, we can conclude that bizarre and unbelievable mispricing of commodities can occur even when the commodity is in very real shortage. Such conditions are the once-in-a-generation opportunities real, battle hardened, ice-water-in-veins veteran contrarians live for. Such conditions are tests of one’s resolve and understanding of the markets we have chosen to invest in. And, if we get it right, if we don’t forget the fundamental drivers that brought us here in the first place, such conditions are the stuff that allow significant improvement in one’s standard of living through opportunistic speculation.

Now, with the current economic crisis forcing the scaling back or outright closure of so many of the world’s mines for things like copper, zinc, nickel, lead, etc., and since silver is largely a byproduct of mining for those base metals, the production profile for silver is almost certainly going to plunge in at least the first two full quarters of 2009 even if things turn around right away. The strangely low prices will ultimately result in even greater shortages of the metal just ahead.

Short term, anything can happen, but just as with gold, the fundamental drivers for silver are truly compelling. As gold regains its rightful position in the world’s collective mind as the ultimate store of value; as gold continues to reflect a growing mistrust of paper currencies and a new found fondness for hard assets; silver will tag along as “the other monetary metal” certainly should. Except there really isn’t enough silver to go around at current artificially depressed futures-dominated pricing. Not nearly enough. That’s one reason so much silver has been leaving COMEX warehouses of late. At some point there’s a chance that the general public will catch on to the indisputable fact that there’s a growing shortage of the metal, so silver could turn into the proverbial moon shot once again. As it did in 1980. Maybe not right away, but chances are it’s a lot sooner now than it would have been had the U.S. government not tried to “fix” things so much back in July and sent so many dominoes tumbling.

Long-term buying and investor accumulation of physical silver today makes much more sense than it ever has in this report’s opinion. If the world avoids falling into a financial abyss, no other commodity is as underpriced relative to gold; no commodity that can be instantly purchased and resold by anyone, anytime, is as well positioned for spectacular gains as the tiny silver market is right now in February, 2009.

That expected rise in popularity and in the dollar value of the metals ought to be very good for the miners and explorers that took it squarely on the chin late last year too. Silver investors need to keep such things firmly in mind going forward. We’ll have much more on this topic in future reports and Brien Lundin will be bringing us some timely opportunities in the sector to take advantage of the ongoing recovery as we move forward in Gold Newsletter.

Gold ETFs

SPDR Gold Shares, [GLD], the largest gold ETF, reported adding another 11.02 tonnes to show 843.59 tonnes of gold bars held for its investors by a custodian in London. As of the Friday close the metal held by the trust was worth $24.9 billion.


Source for data SPDR Gold Trust

So that the price of each share of GLD tracks very closely with the price of 1/10 ounce of gold (less accumulated fees), authorized market participants (AMPs) have to add metal and increase the shares in the trading float when buying pressure strongly outstrips selling pressure. The reverse occurs when selling pressure overwhelms buying pressure.

Barclay’s iShares COMEX Gold Trust [IAU] gold holdings also added 0.61 tonnes to 68.13 tonnes of gold held for its investors. Gold holdings for the U.K. equivalent to GLD, Gold Bullion Securities, Ltd. added a large 9.85 tonnes over the past week, to show 129.92 tonnes of gold held.

All of the gold ETFs sponsored by the World Gold Council showed a collective addition of 21.36 tonnes to their gold holdings to 1,013.86 tonnes worth $29.9 billion.

We continue to see more buying pressure than selling pressure in global gold ETFs. Demand for physical gold on the Street remains robust. A slight increase in scrap has surfaced this week to answer the higher prices.

SLV metal holdings

Silver turned in a higher low in the $11.60s and a higher high again this week (the high was Friday just above the $12.66 close) before a Friday last trade of $12.66. For the week, metal holdings for Barclay’s iShares Silver Trust [SLV], the U.S. silver ETF, added a huge 309.88 tonnes of new silver, to show yet another new record 7,453.15 tonnes of silver metal held for its investors by custodians in London.


Source for data Barclay’s iShares Silver Trust.

Apparently we are not the only ones who believe that silver is cheap. During the month of January, buying pressure so overwhelmed selling pressure for SLV that the authorized market participants (AMPs) increased the float by 21.6 million shares and added 21.2 million ounces (660.16 metric tonnes) of new silver to their allocated metal holdings in London. Not counting the first two months after SLV’s inception in May, 2006, that’s the largest one-month addition of silver metal for the trust.

By the way, 660.16 tonnes of silver is about 21,200 average 1,000 ounce London Good Delivery Bars (LGDBs). Read that sentence again and let it sink in just how much silver was just added to SLV. Got silver? Got SLV?

Got Gold Report Charts

1-year daily gold

2-year weekly gold

1-year daily silver

2-year weekly silver

3-year weekly HUI

2-year weekly Gold:HUI ratio

2-year weekly U.S. dollar index

That’s it for this excerpt of the full Got Gold Report. GoldNewsletter.com subscribers enjoy access to all the Got Gold Report technical analysis and commentary as well as Brien Lundin’s timely advice, analysis and specific resource company recommendations.

Until next time, as always, MIND YOUR STOPS.

The above contains opinion and commentary of the author. Each person should study the issues carefully and, as always, make their own informed decisions. Disclosure: The author currently holds a long position in iShares Silver Trust, net long SPDR Gold Shares and holds various long positions in mining and exploration companies.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Gene Arensberg

A land developer, professional numismatist, self-taught bullion trader and investor since 1980, Gene Arensberg analyzes technical and fundamental developments in the precious metals markets. In 2000 Gene started sharing his own market research with fellow traders and fund managers. Those email reports evolved into his popular Got Gold Report, a biweekly look at important indicators for gold and silver published on the web.

Gene’s more in-depth market reports, insights and trading ideas are a new feature for subscribers of the very popular Gold Newsletter (GNL). GNL is edited and published by Jefferson, Louisiana based Jefferson Direct, Brien Lundin, President. Brien hosts the acclaimed New Orleans Investment Conference each year which has brought investors together with some of the best and most sought after financial experts and investment authorities in the world for over three decades. For more information visit GoldNewsletter.com or New Orleans Investment Conferences.



To: LoneClone who wrote (32163)2/4/2009 1:38:11 PM
From: LoneClone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 193918
 
IS THIS THE DAWNING OF THE AGE OF THORIUM?
By Jack Lifton
04 Feb 2009 at 10:17 AM

resourceinvestor.com

There’s great rejoicing tonight in Salmon, Idaho, because Salmon is the closest town to the Lemhi Pass, and the Lemhi Pass is the location of America’s largest and possibly the world’s richest high-grade thorium oxide deposits.

“So what?” Well, here’s what’s what.

On Oct. 2, 2008 Senator Hatch (R-UT) and Senator Reid (D-NV), then as now the Senate Majority Leader, introduced into the agenda for consideration by the United States Senate a bi-partisan bill, S-3680, entitled Thorium Energy Independence and Security Act of 2008, thomas.loc.gov.

The press release put out by Senator Hatch’s office that same day, hatch.senate.gov contained the following paragraph:

“Using thorium for nuclear power has a number of potential benefits over conventional uranium. As a resource, thorium is abundant in the U.S. and throughout the world. A thorium fuel rod would remain in the reactor about three times as long as conventional nuclear fuel, cutting the volume of spent nuclear fuel by as much as two-thirds. Also, thorium nuclear fuel would significantly reduce the possibility that weapons-grade material would result from the process. Finally, a thorium fuel cycle could be used to dispose of existing plutonium stockpiles, which is the national security goal.”

The above paragraph sums up the arguments for using thorium-based fuel as an alternative to uranium-based fuel for nuclear reactors that I myself first wrote about on ResourceInvestor.com in 2006 in an article I called “Thorium: An Alternative to Uranium,” resourceinvestor.com. I updated that article in early 2007 in my next thorium themed article,” Thorium, An Alternative to Uranium, 2007 Update, “http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=29249&phrase=thorium. Later that year I wrote “Thorium, the Answer to the Question 'How Do You Hedge Uranium?” resourceinvestor.com. In February of 2008 I wrote “How to Invest in Rare Earths and Thorium ,” resourceinvestor.com, and now one year later I think that my timing has been right on the mark, and I want to tell you what has happened and what the natural resource investment opportunities for thorium are and are going to be.

I want to direct your attention to news releases that have been published since the beginning of 2009. If they don’t quicken your interest in the potential of thorium, especially when combined with the Hatch-Reid Bill, then you are simply uninterested in the future direction of non-proliferative low-waste nuclear power. This technology uses a natural resource the United States now possesses in such abundance that, since American mining and refining technology for minor metals, and radioactive metals in particular, is the most advanced and safest in the world. It could make America the principal producer, refiner and exporter of the thorium fuels that are being developed around the world, because, my dear investing public, America probably has more accessible high-grade deposits of thorium that anyone else.

Back to the 2009 news: Check out the International Herald Tribune for February 3, 2009, and you will see the analytical news piece called “A model nuclear-power deal? iht.com; This details the negotiations and agreement between the USA and the Arab states of the Persian Gulf, such as Dubai and Kuwait, that was done in Condoleezza Rice’s last days as Secretary of State. It would give the Emirates the right to buy nuclear power reactor technology from American companies in return for the agreements of the Gulf governments not to ask for or obtain any technology that can be used to make nuclear weapons. As the article points out, a good way to achieve this goal, with no possibility of cheating by either side, is to utilize thorium-based fuel for the reactors. This deal has been announced since the Obama administration took office and therefore we must assume that it is in line with the new President’s policies for reducing greenhouse gas emitting power plant construction and reducing and stopping the proliferation of nuclear weapons. It can be no coincidence that the Hatch-Reid Bill is about to be re-introduced into the new Congress. Clearly, the administration has signaled its support for amending the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to include funding for research and development of thorium-based fuels, thorium reactors, and thorium reactor waste disposal techniques.

I am personally aware of the fact that, even as I write, major American, Canadian, French and British nuclear engineering companies are forming strategic alliances to seek funding under Hatch-Reid to go forward with the development of thorium-based nuclear power reactors for the production of electricity for civilian use.

One year ago at the SME, the USGS sponsored the first annual rare earth’s seminar. The second annual one will be held at the SME annual meeting this year in Denver on Feb. 26. I attended last year’s conference in Salt Lake City, and I asked, as did others, what about the thorium normally found in rare earth ore bodies in North America. The uniform answer from almost all of the miners attending was that “we contain it.” It is removed early on in the separation of the light rare earths, lanthanum to neodymium, and is then contained by being put aside and immobilized. There is often uranium as well as thorium associated with rare earth ore bodies, so I was told that thorium containment is “no problemo” as some miners put it at the conference.

I noted that although everyone at the conference had knowledge of the possible use of thorium in non-proliferative low waste reactors they viewed that as a rather distant possibility and clearly then, in February 2008, classed thorium as a liability and as a cost to be contained.

As the song says, “What a difference a year makes.” The Indian Atomic Energy Authority announced at the beginning of 2009 that it would convert an existing reactor to use thorium-based fuel, with the thorium coming from India’s own monazite sands.

Even earlier than that in Hong Kong in September, I was told that the Chinese government had asked an American manager of a Bayanobo mining operation to tell them just what happened to the thorium separated there from the rare earths. He told me that he was instructed to gather and hold thorium concentrates from now on, and that they would be picked up by the Chinese nuclear power authority, because China was going ahead with the design and building of thorium-based fuel for “thorium” reactors, since China has so much thorium as a byproduct of its world’s largest rare earth mining operations.

Last week, Canada’s Great Western Minerals Group, which told the SME conference in 2007 that its Hoidas Lake, Saskatchewan rare earth deposit was particularly low in thorium, and saw that as a positive, announced that it had bought a concession in the Republic of South Africa to reopen a mine for rare earths that was developed in the 1950s by AngloAmerican originally to produce thorium. Great Western further disclosed that a South African utility had made a deal with GW to have it “contain” the thorium produced in the rare earth mining operation in concrete, so that the utility could take it to their own site when they have prepared it. The utility told them that the South African government has evinced a strong interest in building thorium-based nuclear reactors and that the utility wants to have a domestic fuel source.

So now, what does this have to do with Salmon, Idaho? The answer is that it is the closest town to the claims of the private junior mining company, Thorium Energy, Inc., which announced last year at the SME that its Lemhi Pass, Idaho and other nearby properties were being validated with regard to reserves and resources of thorium, which the company said looked like they might be the richest and most extensive in North America. The USGS has now recognized that the company’s thorium reserves and resources are among the largest in the world and recently amended its Commodity Survey of Thorium to reflect that. Thorium Energy’s claims also contain substantial quantities of the rare earths, particularly of the light rare earths. An engineering manager at an American nuclear engineering company moving forward on the development of thorium reactors pointed out to me last week that TEI could produce thorium as a product along with rare earth elements as a secondary product or the other way around. In the one case, he noted that TEI would become and could well become the world’s first primary thorium miner in half a century, and perhaps the largest one ever if the validation is accurate.

The engineer thought that as a step towards American energy self sufficiency and independence, it was potentially a giant step. Perhaps we are about to step into the age of the last of the power metals to be developed for mankind’s use, thorium.





Jack Lifton is a featured contributor to the new Resource Investor. With 35 years experience in the OEM electronics and automotive supply industries, he is today a metals sourcing consultant for OEM heavy industry and offers due diligence analysis for institutional investors. Lifton is a prominent speaker on the market fundamentals of minor metals and their end-uses and travels the world on behalf of Fortune 500 and Global 1000 corporations. Reach him directly at JackLifton@aol.com.