Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (154202)	2/7/2009 5:36:26 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Stephen Hawking has said, in his writings, "the actual point of creation lies outside the scope of presently known laws of physics," and a less well-known but very distinguished cosmologist, Professor Alan Guth from MIT, says the "instant of creation remains unexplained." google.com

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (154202)	2/8/2009 1:40:22 AM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Since I don't know what a "Bib Bang" is other than a baby explosively puking, I will assume you meant Big Bang. The Big Bang can exist right after time began, in reference to the Big Bang time reference. What happened just before, a nanosecond before, to allow the Big Bang to happen? Where did the atoms and primordial soup come from for it to perfectly ferment to make the Earth, the Universe and seed life. Where did the building blocks come from? You cannot answer, you theory fails. Just because it is the best supported does in no way make the theory plausible. You ever had two choices and they both suck? Think of the last election. We got an asshole with less experience than Palin, now acting like a king, the alternative was a POW asshole who was probably certifiable nuts. You have a choice to admit God exists, or your beloved theory is not provable. To me the choice is simple.