Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (69358)	2/8/2009 4:20:14 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

Porkulus math: A breakdown of Collins/Nelson stimulus changes. By Michelle Malkin February 7, 2009 02:16 PM We still don’t have the actual, full text of the Collins/Nelson porkulus “compromise” plan, but we do have a financial breakdown of the changes the cave-in Senators have proposed. The Senate Conservatives Fund has posted the math — and remember, this chart does NOT include the money added by the Senate amendments (close to $50 billion in extra spending). Go here for the PDF. senateconservatives.files.wordpress.com Bottom line: <<< Senators Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) have said repeatedly that their goal was to eliminate those parts of the bill that are not stimulative. But this document shows that this spending has not been eliminated, but only reduced. If this spending does not stimulate (and it most certainly does not), then why not eliminate it completely? And if the goal was to simply lower the price of the plan to protect taxpayers, the Nelson-Collins deal fails in that effort as well. At $827 billion, the compromise will cost $7 billion MORE than the bill passed by Nancy Pelosi in the House. >>> michellemalkin.com

To: Sully- who wrote (69358)	2/8/2009 4:48:23 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

NYT: Republicans Voting for Stimulus Package Are Being Patriotic By Noel Sheppard on New York Times NewsBusters.org newsbusters.org

To: Sully- who wrote (69358)	2/8/2009 4:59:18 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Who's Patriotic? By John Power Line Liberals used to love to claim that President Bush accused his political opponents of being unpatriotic. It wasn't true, of course; Bush never said any such thing. But last night, Barack Obama came perilously close to making that claim about Republicans who oppose his pork bill. From the New York Times: <<< Mr. Obama called Ms. Collins and Mr. Specter, as well as Senator Olympia J. Snowe of Maine, another Republican expected to support the deal, to acknowledge they were acting against pressure from their party and, one official said, to thank them for their patriotism in helping advance the bill at a critical time. >>> So, if the three Republicans who sided with the Democrats in the Senate are "patriotic," what does that make the rest of the Senate Republicans, or the House Republicans who unanimously voted against the Democrats' pork-fest? Unpatriotic? Isn't that a natural inference? Barack Obama is well on his way to an extraordinarily partisan and divisive administration. Which helps to explain, I think, why his own popularity is shriveling. Rasmussen reports that Obama's approval rating is down to 60%--not bad, but nothing special for a President who has been in office for less than three weeks. More striking is the decline in Obama's "approval index," i.e., the difference between those who strongly approve of his performance and those who strongly disapprove. This graph, from Rasmussen's site, shows how Obama's "strong approval" has declined while his "strong disapproval" has increased: To some extent this reflects partisan differences that inevitably come to the fore once a President begins to act; only 9% of Republicans now strongly approve of his performance (one can only wonder who they are; maybe they live in Maine.) But Obama's decline is more widespread: he has slipped even more among Democrats, and only 64% now strongly approve of his performance. Likewise, Obama has fallen off among voters not affiliated with either party; strong "approvers" outnumber strong disapprovers by only 29%-24%. Does this mean the media will soon stop gushing about Obama's extraordinary popularity and charisma? No. But his numbers are probably destined to fall further as voters start to feel the hangover from Obama's pork bill. To comment on this post, go here. plnewsforum.com powerlineblog.com