SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill c. who wrote (7272)10/24/1997 12:10:00 PM
From: David Nelson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21342
 
That's an OK definition of a contract. I was speaking of WSTL's responsibilities ragarding 3 alleged contracts between WSTL and 3 alleged whomsoevers. How can WSTL be held responsible for undisclosed contracts?

I hope they can just incase this stock continues to tank. These are the things that shareholder suits are made of.

--Dave



To: bill c. who wrote (7272)10/24/1997 3:02:00 PM
From: cirrus  Respond to of 21342
 
WSTL needs the business and has competition. Under these circumstances, one would expect a telco to negotiate a "binding agreement" with enough escape clauses to make it virtually worthless.

<<<a binding agreement between two or more persons or parties; esp: one legally enforceable...>>>


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News