SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (29259)2/13/2009 7:23:32 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Spending=Patriotism?

Greg Pollowitz
The Corner

Barack Obama from July:


<<< “It is worth considering the meaning of patriotism because the question of who is – or is not – a patriot all too often poisons our political debates, in ways that divide us rather than bring us together,” >>>


Harry Reid from today:


<<< “I’m really at a lack of words how to express my admiration/respect for the love of our country, the patriotism and the courage of three brave senators: Specter from Pennsylvania, Snowe and Collins from Maine.” >>>

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)5/28/2009 10:26:27 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Speaking Bluntly

Harry Reid’s book is unintentionally unflattering.

By Mark Hemingway
National Review Online

On Tuesday, Senate majority leader Harry Reid threw one heck of a book party. His memoir, The Good Fight: Hard Lessons from Searchlight to Washington, just came out in paperback, and to celebrate the occasion the Nevada senator held a fundraiser at Caesar’s Palace. The event, billed under the same title as the book, featured Vegas headliner Bette Midler, as well as Sheryl Crow. But the star of course was Barack Obama, who spent the evening praising Harry Reid and working on his stage banter — “Hello, Las Vegas,” “Give it up for our outstanding performers,” etc. The cost of admission? A mere $2,400 toward Reid’s reelection — the maximum allowable campaign donation.

Most authors would kill to promote their work with these kinds of resources. But having recently read The Good Fight, it seems doubtful to me that even a star-studded party (literally singing the book’s praises) and an endorsement by the leader of the free world can sell this turkey. And given how unintentionally unflattering the book is to its author, Reid would probably be better off keeping the book’s existence quiet.

And it’s been kept pretty quiet so far. Released a year ago, the book got one glowing review: from his hometown paper. Every other major media outlet has been standoffish. Take this blurb from the Washington Post, proudly emblazoned on the back of the paperback edition: “Recounts fights with everyone from classmates to the man who would eventually become his father-in-law, preparing him for a senatorial life of battling the Bush White House and Republican filibusters.” Beware the value-neutral blurb: In fact, the Post never reviewed the book — the quote comes from a gossip column published a month before the book’s release. One of the most powerful men in Washington published a book, and the entire journalistic establishment’s reaction seems to have been, “If you can’t say something nice . . . ”

Of course, Reid doesn’t always have nice things to say himself. While no one expects Reid to praise George W. Bush, the degree to which he is judgmental and catty regarding the former president pretty much speaks for itself. Three pages in, after lamely trying to establish his bipartisan bona fides by talking up George H. W. Bush, Reid shares this charming anecdote about his early days in the Senate: “[Former Texas senator and vice-presidential candidate Lloyd] Bentsen went on and on effusively about what a quality man President-elect [H. W.] Bush was. Then he paused and said, ‘But watch out for his wife; she’s a bitch.’ I have never had anything against Mrs. Bush, but guided by Bentsen’s crude advice, I’ve always said that our forty-third president is more his mother than his dad.”

What’s the purpose of recording for posterity a bit of hearsay defaming a woman Reid admits he has no cause to dislike? Is Reid really so petty as to insult someone’s mother? Why yes, yes he is.

Here’s another unintentionally revealing anecdote describing Reid’s relationship with Bush.
In a passage describing a meeting the two men had at the White House on the sixth anniversary of 9/11, Reid writes: “That day he wore on his face a look of bravado that we’ve all come to know, and said something I will never have the words to adequately describe. But to understand what he said is to understand something profound about the problem at the heart of the administration. Speaking of the fact that the war was being used by radical Islamists for jihadi recruitment, Bush said, ‘Of course, al Qaeda needs new recruits, because we’re killin’ ’em.’ He then gave a smirk — that ‘Bring ’em on’ smirk — that we’ve all come to know. ‘We’re killin’ ’em all,’ he said.”

Oh, the horror. Naturally, this comment of Bush’s is followed up with pages of Reid recollecting the perfectly composed monologue he gave in response. (It also helpfully explains in exacting detail why the surge plan then being considered wouldn’t work, with no acknowledgment in retrospect that it did.)

And here’s what happened two days later: “I publicly said that the war is lost.” Perhaps Reid should have worried that one of the United States’ most powerful politician’s declaring the war lost would be a ginormous jihadi-recruitment tool. But no, after pages of describing what a dangerous, shoot-from-the-hip, totally-unwilling-to-genuflect kind of guy George W. Bush is, Reid responds to the remark that will forever define his political career by reiterating that he won’t apologize for having said it.

“I speak bluntly. Sometimes I can be impulsive. I believe something to be right and do it. And then I don’t worry about it,” Reid writes. Now if that remark were included in George W. Bush’s forthcoming memoirs, it would be held up proof positive that Bush is the short-sighted, close-minded simpleton of the Angry Left’s longstanding caricature. And yet, Reid openly admits to the very leadership style that Democrats — Reid included — supposedly deplored in the 43rd president.
Elsewhere in the book, Reid recounts stories that make his political success seem positively baffling. In particular, he retells how he learned the ways of the Senate at the feet of his predecessor as leader of the Senate Democrats, Tom Daschle. Here’s a story about that dynamic duo that contains multitudes:

In the first year of the Clinton administration, Tom and I had the idea to go to the White House and recommend that President Clinton appoint George Mitchell of Maine, who was then Senate Majority Leader, to the Supreme Court. “Why would I do that?” the President responded. “There’s a Republican governor in Maine. He’d appoint a Republican to replace him.” Well, we hadn’t thought of that, but on the walk back to the Capitol, I had said to Daschle, “Tom, when a leadership position comes open, you should run for it. I think you’d do well.” And sure enough, after George Mitchell unexpectedly retired from the Senate in 1994, Daschle had become the Minority Leader, and in 1998 I had become the Minority Whip.

Oh, where to begin. So Reid went to the president and suggested displacing the sitting Senate majority leader without bothering to think about who would replace him? Daschle comes off only mildly better here, as it’s possible to imagine that he was angling all along to get Mitchell out of the Senate so he could assume the role of leading the Senate Democrats himself. But if that’s true, it almost makes Reid look dumber still — carrying Daschle’s water, completely unaware of his motives, and even, gee willikers, suggesting Daschle run for a leadership post.

Thus Reid vacillates between outright spite toward his political enemies and unwarranted fawning over his political allies. And when he’s not at one of those extremes, he’s being outright delusional about himself.
Here he is describing his one term as a state legislator beginning in 1969. “I only spent one term in the Nevada assembly, and when I went up to Carson City they called me a liberal. I don’t know why, exactly, as I’ve never been big on labels,” Reid writes. He doesn’t know why they called him a liberal? Let’s refer to the very next paragraph: “At the time I was struggling with a number of other legislators to write a law in the State of Nevada — a law that would be upheld by the court — that under certain conditions would give a woman the right to have an abortion in the first trimester.” This was four years before Roe v. Wade. That might provide a clue to the mystery.

The book’s only redeeming quality is that it’s not entirely about Reid’s political career. Prior to entering national politics, Reid lived a pretty colorful life — he was born into poverty in a small Nevada town where prostitution was the main industry, was a semi-pro boxer for a time, converted to Mormonism, worked as a Capitol police officer in D.C. while going to law school, was a criminal-defense attorney in Las Vegas in the 1960s, and became chairman of the Nevada Gaming commission in the late ’70s, a job that found him dealing with the mob and all sorts of characters.

Despite all this material, though, the only really compelling part of the book is Reid’s retelling of a bizarre murder case in Wyoming, in which he represented the accused. What we have is a 300-page patchwork of pointless political score-settling that tries far too hard to cast his Senate career in the best possible light, interwoven with the underdeveloped memoirs of an unreliable narrator.

Of course, the book’s re-release was but a flimsy pretext for Tuesday’s fundraiser. He’s going to need the money. A poll taken just last week “found that 45 percent of Nevada voters would ‘definitely’ vote against Reid next year — with only 30 percent saying they want to see him return to office.” It seems the only way Reid’s approval ratings could go any lower is if his constituents read his book.

— Mark Hemingway is an NRO staff reporter.

article.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)6/27/2009 3:58:45 AM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Respond to of 35834
 
Harry Reid: doubling down on his own ignorance

Betsy's Page

It's nice when our political leaders acknowledge that they're passing massive changes to our economy without even reading what it is that they're passing. And Harry Reid is quite up front about it.


<<< Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D- Nev.) will not commit to giving senators and the public a full week to read and review the final version of a health-care reform bill before he holds a final vote on it.

Reid confessed at his Thursday news briefing that he did not have “a lot of time” to read the 1,071-page stimulus bill before voting on it in February.

He was unapologetic, however, about the way Congress rushed that bill through before it could be reviewed by senators and the public, and declined to commit to giving senators and the public at least a week to read the final version of health-care reform bill before calling a vote on it.

“Looking back, I don’t know how much time people had," Reid said about the stimulus bill in response to a question from CNSNews.com. "I know that I didn’t have a lot of time." >>>

Remember that bill. They had to rush it through before the three-day weekend before Obama would come back to sign the thing. They couldn't, however, give up a couple days of that weekend to actually read the more than 1000 pages that they were voting on. So how much time will they need for the health bill? A few hours hours between midnight and 3 am?

betsyspage.blogspot.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)8/6/2009 6:10:31 AM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Respond to of 35834
 
Kos v. Reid

By Jonah Goldberg
The Corner

Words to remember:

<<< With 50 votes and Vice President Dick Cheney’s tiebreaker , Republicans strutted around the Senate as if they had a national mandate. Democrats, given a 60-vote supermajority by voters, do little more than make excuses for failure.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is the chief culprit, routinely citing the need for that magical 60-vote margin as his answer for his chamber’s ineffectiveness. Indeed, the Senate is where good legislation goes to die, much to the chagrin of the more activist House. Reid’s Senate watered down President Barack Obama’s stimulus package, and now the Senate is attempting to block additional money for the wildly successful cash-for-clunkers program that is revitalizing the domestic auto industry. And it’s the Senate that’s currently providing the biggest roadblock to effective healthcare reform.

The magical 60-vote margin seemed a plausible — if lame — excuse when the Senate was stuck at 57 Democrats and two Independents in the Democratic caucus, but the swearing-in of Al Franken should have laid that alibi to rest. With 60 votes, the Democrats now own the chamber. Any failures are theirs alone. >>>

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)8/14/2009 6:54:09 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Harry Reid: Town-hall protesters are “evil-mongers”

by Allahpundit
Hot Air blog

It’s his own coinage, as nasty and awkward as the man himself. And like a two-year-old who’s just crapped on the carpet, he’s curiously proud of it.

<<< Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader, was having second thoughts – or was he? – about the way he had characterized people who are disrupting town halls with “lies, innuendo and rumor,” and not letting others speak. They are, he said, “evil-mongers.”

A day after tossing out the term “evil-mongers” in the closing speech of his annual clean energy conference, Reid was alternating between pride in his coinage and knowing that he probably should be trying to defuse, not escalate, the turmoil erupting at town meetings across the country on health care reform.

“It was an original with me. I maybe could have been less descriptive,” Reid said. He also said, “I doubt that you’ll hear it from me again.” But a few minutes later, he couldn’t resist a sardonic little joke. “I feel I haven’t done anything to embarrass them,” Reid said of his children. “Except maybe call somebody an evil-monger.” >>>

Mind you, this is a guy who’s up for reelection next year and whose unfavorable rating already stands at 50 percent. I’d love to see the internal polling that’s convinced him and Baron Hill that egregiously demonizing protesters — whom more Americans are sympathetic to than not — is a sure path to victory. Consider this further proof, though, that William McGurn was right in dubbing ObamaCare the left’s new religion, with protester-heretics now officially deemed “evil” for shouting about it. Exit question: Isn’t this actually the left’s line on the right in all policy disagreements? Pick any issue you like, foreign or domestic, and liberal conventional wisdom has some nefarious explanation available for the conservative position. Warmongering, racism, exploiting the poor, “controlling women’s bodies” — you name it, they’ve got an “evil” ulterior motive to account for it. I wonder why it took Reid this long to drop the E-bomb. He must really want to win this debate.


hotair.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)9/1/2009 6:12:10 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Las Vegas Publisher Stands By Claim That Reid Threatened Employee

FOXNews.com
Tuesday, September 01, 2009

The publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal on Tuesday stood by his claim that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid threatened one of the newspaper's employees, after Reid's office claimed the alleged threat was meant as a joke.

Publisher Sherman Frederick first accused Reid of "bullying" in a column Sunday. He said Reid told his paper's ad director, "I hope you go out of business," at a local Chamber of Commerce luncheon a few days earlier.

After the column generated a lot of controversy and attention, Reid spokesman Jon Summers claimed the newspaper misinterpreted the remark.

"Clearly he wasn't serious," he said. "Once again, the editors at the Review-Journal got it wrong."

But Frederick told FOX News that Reid's trademark dry wit was not at play here.

"We were there. We heard it. He was mad," he said. "No matter what angle we look at it, it's pretty darn ugly."

An article in the Review-Journal Tuesday said the original column generated thousands of reader comments and dozens of letters. Frederick told FOX News, though, that his complaint about Reid was in no way a publicity stunt.

"We're not making this up. We're worried. I mean, Senator Reid is not just any U.S. senator," he said. "The only way I know to deal with a bully is to not necessarily beat him up but just to simply stand up to him and shine the light of day on him. And it's my only defense."

Reid and the Review-Journal have what the newspaper described as a "mixed relationship."

The newspaper endorsed Republican John Ensign, then a congressman, over Reid in 1998. Ensign is now the state's other senator. But the paper endorsed Reid in 2004.

However, Reid is facing a challenging run for re-election in 2010, something the newspaper has drawn attention to.

The Review-Journal last month published a poll showing GOP candidate Danny Tarkanian leading Reid by 49 percent to 38 percent in the race. Tarkanian is a former basketball player for the University of Nevada-Las Vegas.

foxnews.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)9/26/2009 4:43:25 PM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Respond to of 35834
 
Hometown Grief for Reid on ACORN

By: Kathryn Jean Lopez
The Corner

The Las Vegas Review-Journal hits Harry Reid today on ACORN in an editorial titled: “Reid blocks ACORN probe: Tracking abuse by political allies could be 'distracting.'” It points out that for his state, the pimp-and-prostitute video was simply an opportunity to recall what Nevada already knew:


<<< Here in Clark County, Registrar of Voters Larry Lomax said last year he saw "rampant fraud in the 2,000 to 3,000 registrations ACORN turns in every week," with some 48 percent of those forms being "clearly fraudulent."

The Las Vegas headquarters of ACORN, "a Democrat-allied organization," was raided after being "accused of submitting multiple voter registrations with duplicate and false names," the Washington Times reported last fall. The outfit claimed it had registered to vote in Nevada, among others, the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys.

The raid "set off a skirmish over efforts to expand the electorate on behalf of Sen. Barack Obama," the Times reported.

Mr. Lomax noted ACORN had hired 59 inmates from a work-release program at a nearby prison and that some inmates who had been convicted of identity theft had been made supervisors. "That led some local wags to joke that at least ACORN was hiring specialists to do their work," reported John Fund at The Politico, last November.

ACORN's 2008 Las Vegas field director, Christopher Edwards, pleased guilty last spring to two gross misdemeanor counts of conspiracy to commit compensation for registration of voters, in a deal that saw him agree to testify against fellow defendants. >>>


Senator Reid, why would you block an investigation? It’s a good question to ask the Majority Leader -- one who already happens to be facing a tough reelection contest next year.


corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)12/7/2009 4:16:43 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Reid Compares Opponents of Health Care Reform to Supporters of Slavery

.... Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took his GOP-blasting rhetoric to a new level Monday, comparing Republicans who oppose health care reform to lawmakers who clung to the institution of slavery more than a century ago. ....

feeds.foxnews.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)12/9/2009 12:54:30 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Calls Mount for Reid to Apologize Over Slavery Remark

FOXNews.com

From Nevada to Washington, calls were mounting Tuesday for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to apologize for comparing opponents of health care reform to supporters of slavery.

The antagonistic comment, made on the Senate floor Monday
, came at a sensitive time for health care reform, with Democratic leaders trying to push a compromise by the holidays, and in the middle of Reid's heated race for re-election in Nevada. The remark did not bode well for either effort.

Senate Republicans blasted Reid for the comparison, calling it "offensive" and "unbelievable" and suggesting he was starting to "crack" under the pressure of the health care reform effort.

In the comment, Reid argued that Republicans are using the same stalling tactics employed in the pre-Civil War era -- and during the women's suffrage and civil rights movements.

"Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all the Republicans can come up with is, 'slow down, stop everything, let's start over.' If you think you've heard these same excuses before, you're right," Reid said Monday. "When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said 'slow down, it's too early, things aren't bad enough.'"

He continued: "When women spoke up for the right to speak up, they wanted to vote, some insisted they simply, slow down, there will be a better day to do that, today isn't quite right.

"When this body was on the verge of guaranteeing equal civil rights to everyone regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today."

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele called the comment an "ignorant moment," citing the comparison as the latest Democratic bid to play the "race card."

"It has nothing to do with the historic roots of slavery. ... Harry needs to go to the well of the Senate, take it back, and apologize for offending the sensibilities of the American people on something so important," he told CBS News on Tuesday.

Reid's potential Republican opponents in the 2010 Nevada Senate race were also quick to condemn the remark, noting that a new poll suggests most Nevadans oppose the health care reform package on Capitol Hill.

"It seems that with the more power and prestige that Senator Reid gains in Washington, the more insulting he gets towards those of us back home," former state GOP Chairwoman Sue Lowden said in a statement. "Now, he compares the majority of Nevadans opposing his government-run health care scheme to proponents of slavery. ... Senator Reid should apologize -- once again -- for his unfortunate comments about our citizens."

Las Vegas businessman Danny Tarkanian also called on Reid to apologize, calling his remark a "disgrace" to the Senate and an "embarrassment" to his state.

Both Tarkanian and Lowden are seen as potentially formidable opponents for Reid. A new poll commissioned by the Las Vegas Review-Journal and conducted by Mason-Dixon showed Nevada voters favoring Lowden over Reid by 51-to-41 percent, and favoring Tarkanian over Reid by 48-to-42 percent. The poll of 625 Nevada voters had a margin of error of 4 percentage points.

The newspaper's polling also found that 53 percent of Nevadans oppose President Obama's health care reform proposals, though a significant majority wants to see some kind of reform.

The Reid criticism came from both sides of the aisle.

Richard Harpootlian, former chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, said the comparison was a sign of "silly season in Washington."

"We see Harry Reid saying silly things on one side, we see Republicans talking about killing grandma on the other -- wake up, Washington," he said.

But Reid stood by the remarks on Tuesday, saying those attacking him are "only proving my point."

"I think the point is quite clear by this point that at pivotal points in American history, the tactics of distortion, delay have certainly been present. They've been used to stop progress. That's what we're talking about here. That's what's happening here. It's very clear. That's a point I made -- no more, no less," he said.

Spokesman Jim Manley called the backlash "feigned outrage."

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that neither he nor the president was aware of the remarks.

"(The) Senate is focused on passing a health care bill," Gibbs said.

feeds.foxnews.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)12/9/2009 6:26:39 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
As Long as Harry Reid Raises the Subject...

By Scott Strzelczyk
American Thinker

Harry Reid's comments on the Senate floor yesterday likening opponents of the Democrats' health care legislation to proponents of slavery were inexcusable. Just to set the record straight:

The Democratic Party vehemently opposed the abolition of slavery, Reconstruction, and black suffrage. Today, the Democratic Party aggressively pursues an enslavement platform through socialist ideology. One cause of the Civil War was the contrasting economic philosophies between the North and the South. Northern Republicans embraced free-market economic principles while Southern Democrats embraced a labor-based economy reliant upon slavery for its existence.

Formed in the mid-1850s, the Republican Party plank called for the immediate abolition of slavery in the southern states, while the Democratic Party plank explicitly called for a continuation of slavery. This was not only an issue of "all men are created equal and no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, and property without due process of the law," but also of states' rights versus the federal government and a free-market society versus a slave-labor society. In his book Back to Basics for the Republican Party, author Michael Zak writes:

<<< Republicans correctly viewed the Civil War as a battle for supremacy between the slave system and the free market society. The slave system, the very opposite of the free market society the Republican Party advocated, required a vast regulatory and enforcement infrastructure to keep people enchained for the benefit of others, just as the socialist policies of the Democratic Party do today. [Emphasis added.] Trapped in the role once filled by slaves before the war and then afterward by poor blacks during the Jim Crow era, an underclass today maintains the political and economic power of the Democratic Party elite and those in their employ, if indirectly, in the government bureaucracy. No underclass would mean no immense bureaucracy to run the welfare state established by the Democrat Lyndon Johnson administration. >>>


The Democratic Party is drenched in the blood of slavery. Not only did they explicitly include pro-slavery positions in official party planks for decades, but they also instituted insidious laws throughout the South referred to as "black codes" and, later, Jim Crow laws. For nearly one hundred years the Democratic Party opposed all civil rights legislation, the 13th through 15th Amendments, reconstruction efforts, anti-lynching legislation, and desegregation. To add insult to injury, the Ku Klux Klan was formed in the late 1860s and functioned as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party. From the 1860s to the 1960s, approximately 4,700 people were lynched in the United States -- roughly 3,500 black people and 1,200 white people, most of them Republican. The official Democrat and Republican Party planks can be found here. A full historical accounting and commentary on civil rights legislation by both parties can be found here. The Democratic Party has a long and illustrious history with slavery.

Reconstruction efforts by the Republicans were delayed by three years due to the assassination of President Lincoln by John Wilkes Booth. Lincoln's vice president was Democrat Andrew Johnson. For the next three years, President Johnson blocked reconstruction efforts and allowed Southern state governments to form under Confederate leadership and stood idly by while Southern states instituted black codes. Republicans voted unanimously for the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution. Nearly every Democrat in Congress voted against the 13th Amendment. Every Democrat in Congress voted against the 14th Amendment, and President Johnson vetoed it. In fact, President Johnson offered $20,000 towards defeating the 14th Amendment's ratification. After Lincoln's assassination, the Democratic Party seized power, and Republicans were unable to quickly reconstruct the South into a free-market economy. Unfortunately, the effort to guarantee civil rights to black Americans was an agonizing, century-long struggle.

Over the next ninety years, the Democratic Party oppressed blacks through intimidation, violence, and Jim Crow laws. Poll taxes, literacy tests, and other obstacles were instituted to keep black men from voting. For the most part, blacks were kept poor and uneducated by the Democratic Party. Finally, in the mid-1960s civil rights legislation was introduced in Congress. This legislation was nearly identical to Charles Sumner's Civil Rights Act of 1875. Most Southern Democrats fiercely opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 just as they opposed Sumner's Civil Rights Act of 1875. Nearly all congressional Republicans voted for it.

The Senate Majority Leader needs some remedial education.

americanthinker.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)1/11/2010 2:35:14 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (9) | Respond to of 35834
 
Democrats close ranks around Reid

Apology for racial remarks called sufficient

By Joseph Curl
washingtontimes.com

Democrats on Sunday rallied to the defense of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid from a political firestorm caused by his newly reported remarks during the 2008 presidential campaign describing Barack Obama as "light-skinned" who chose to speak "with no Negro dialect."

"I think if you look at the reports as I have, it was all in the context of saying positive things about Senator Obama," said Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine. "It definitely was in the context of recognizing in Senator Obama a great candidate and future president."

Mr. Reid apologized to Mr. Obama on Saturday, and the president issued a statement accepting the apology and saying he considered the matter closed.

The Nevada Democrat, a pivotal figure in Mr. Obama's hopes of passing a health care reform bill and other top agenda items, said later Sunday that he had no intention of resigning his leadership post or his Senate seat, as Republican lawmakers began demanding Sunday.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, said Mr. Reid should not resign and defended his remark as just a "mistake."

"Clearly, the leader misspoke. He has also apologized. He's not only apologized to the president, I think he's apologized to all of the black leadership that he could reach," she said. "So the president has accepted the apology, and it would seem to me that the matter should be closed."

In a private conversation reported in a new book, "Game Change" by journalists Mark Halperin of Time and John Heilemann of New York magazine, Mr. Reid described Mr. Obama as an ideal candidate for the 2008 presidential campaign because he was a "light-skinned" black man "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one."

While Democrats rallied to the Senate leader's side, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele mocked Mr. Kaine's defense and he called on Mr. Reid to resign.

"If [Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell had said those very words, then this chairman and this president would be calling for his head, and they would be labeling every Republican in the country a racist for saying exactly what this chairman's just said," Mr. Steele said.

Mr. Steele also compared Mr. Reid's remark to comments by Trent Lott, Mississippi Republican, in 2002. Mr. Lott, the Senate majority leader at the time, said at the 100th birthday celebration of 1948 presidential candidate Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina that "if the rest of the country had followed [Mississippi's] lead" in supporting Mr. Thurmond, "we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years."

washingtontimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)2/23/2010 2:34:44 PM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Respond to of 35834
 
ZOMG!!! Poor Mrs. Harry Reid…!!!

Darleen Click
protein wisdom

…someone, quick, have an intervention ready so that when Harry Reid loses his seat in the Senate, he doesn’t go and beat her up!

<<< “Men when they’re out of work tend to become abusive,” Reid said
as he argued in favor of a cloture vote on the jobs bill. “I met with some people while I was home dealing with domestic abuse. It has gotten out of hand. Why? Men don’t have jobs. Women don’t have jobs either, but women aren’t abusive, most of the time. Men, when they’re out of work, tend to become abusive. Our domestic crisis shelters in Nevada are jammed.” >>>

Wow, the awesome power of the Federal Government – create jobs, solve domestic abuse!

I look forward to Harry’s bill giving tax breaks to companies that hire men ahead of women and grants to colleges that reverse their female-heavy student enrollment.

Cuz if you oppose Harry, you know you’re just obviously in favor of Violence Against the Womens.


proteinwisdom.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)7/27/2010 12:42:28 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Video: Reid praises ‘good’ Republicans
By: Charlie Spiering
Online Community Manager
07/27/10 11:50 AM EDT
Reid praises ‘good’ Republicans

Speaking to liberal activists at Netroots Nation last weekend, Senator Harry Reid, reminded progressives that good Senate Republicans exist. Two of them.


“Remember also, don’t badmouth all Republicans, because the Senate Republicans do not represent mainstream Republicans throughout this country.” Reid said, “We have two moderate Republican senators and I will always respect and admire, and do everything I can to recognize that they are good senators. (Sens.) Snowe and Collins from Maine.”

“I just hope I don’t get them into trouble for saying nice things to them here.”
he added.

Looks like Sen. Scott Brown didn’t make the cut, even though he joined Snowe and Collins, voting to move the controversial financial bill forward.

YouTube Reid Praising "Good" Republicans:

Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)9/21/2010 2:29:41 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Reid raising funds from energy industries he subsidizes

By: Timothy P. Carney
Senior Examiner Columnist
09/21/10 12:25 PM EDT

Tomorrow morning, if you want a nice breakfast, have $2,500 to spare, and depend for your paycheck on federal energy subsidies, show up at Charlie Palmer Steak on Capitol Hill. Harry Reid is hosting a fundraiser “with energy and natural resources industry leaders,” including the lobbies for the utilities, wind, and solar lobbies

As of earlier this week, the hosts were:

American Wind Energy Association PAC
Edison International PAC
ITC Holdings PAC
Solar Energy Industries Association PAC

Some notes on these Reid boosters:

Wind energy is heavily subsidized at the state and federal level. One provision in the stimulus changed the “production tax credit” — a subsidy when windmills create electricity — into an “investment tax credit,” which gives you subsidy just for building the windmill, even if it doesn’t spin. That “tax credit,” however,” is available in the form of a check, long before tax day. In other words, it’s just corporate welfare.

The Edison Electric Institute is the lobby for utilities. This lobby endorsed the House cap-and-trade bill, and won many tweaks in it that would basically turn “climate legislation” into a cash cow for the industry.

ITC Holdings builds new power lines, which it touts as more efficient and more reliable. These benefits have value, but if Congress subsidizes transmission and taxes electricity, it’s driving business to ITC.

Solar energy, even more than wind, needs subsidies in order to survive. A Renewable Energy Standard, requiring power companies to use solar, and cap-and-trade (which taxes fossil fuels) would help this industry.

So Reid, President Obama, and other Democrats talk about energy debates as if they pit Big Oil against the polar bears, but Reid’s campaign coffers tell a different story:

Reid supports subsidies for these industries, and they raise funds for him. It sounds a bit like a quid-pro-quo.

Here’s the invite:

<<< I wanted to send a quick reminder about the special breakfast with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid this Wednesday, September 22nd, with energy and natural resources industry leaders. The event begins at 7:45 am at Charlie Palmer Steak.

This will be one of our last events in Washington, DC before the election in November. I encourage all of you to attend and to pass this invite along to your clients and colleagues.

As you know, this is an incredibly important race, and a very close one. The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll has us ahead by two. Sharron Angle is spending over $500,000 a week on TV while Karl Rove and their Tea Party pals pump in even more. Your support will ensure that we can go toe-to-toe with them and win on November 2nd.

Thank you, and I look forward to seeing you on Wednesday.
-Josh

American Wind Energy Association PAC
Edison International PAC
ITC Holdings PAC
Solar Energy Industries Association PAC

(Host Committee In Formation)
cordially invite you to join them for a breakfast honoring
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:45 am – 8:30 am

Location: Charlie Palmer Steak
101 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC

Suggested Contribution:
$2,500 PAC Host
$1,500 PAC Guest
$500 Individual

Contributions should be made payable to “Friends for Harry Reid”

Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)10/22/2010 8:14:50 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Reid: I saved the world from a great depression

By: David Freddoso
Online Opinion Editor
10/21/10 9:05 PM EDT

Throughout his debate with Republican Sharron Angle, Harry Reid’s contempt for her showed in every facial expression he made and in his tone of voice with every word he said. How could he be losing to this idiot?

The former boxer entered these last two weeks of the campaign looking like the prize fighter who can’t understand why his opponent wasn’t knocked out several rounds ago.

His frustration manifests itself in new gaffes. And here’s the newest one, from the Ed Show today:

YouTube: Harry Reid Takes Credit For Saving The World

“But for me, we’d be in a worldwide depression.” Problem is, if you live in Nevada, you probably feel like you are in the middle of a worldwide depression.

As John McCain learned the hard way in 2008, there is no better way to give people the idea that you’re out of touch than to say the economy is doing well when most people feel like it isn’t. And in Nevada, where unemployment is 14.4 percent, it really isn’t.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)10/26/2010 7:12:18 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
EXCLUSIVE: Aide to Harry Reid Lied to Feds, Submitted False Documents About Sham Marriage

By Jana Winter
FoxNews.com
Published October 25, 2010

An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid repeatedly lied to federal immigration and FBI agents and submitted false federal documents to the Department of Homeland Security to cover up her illegal seven-year marriage to a Lebanese national who was the subject of an Oklahoma City Joint Terror Task Force investigation, FoxNews.com has learned.

Diana Tejada, Reid’s Hispanic Press Secretary, admitted to receiving payment for “some of her expenses” in exchange for fraudulently marrying Bassam Mahmoud Tarhini in 2003, strictly so he could obtain permanent U.S. residency, according to court documents.


Tarhini, now 37, was held in jail and at an immigration detention center in connection with his 2009 indictment on felony charges, documents show. He pleaded guilty to entering a fraudulent marriage to evade immigration laws — a Class D felony — in November 2009, and he was deported in March 2010.

Tejada, now 28, was never charged for her role in the crime.

“We did not charge the woman, and of course we don’t discuss the reasons we don’t charge people,” said Bob Troester, spokesman for the Western District of Oklahoma U.S. Attorney’s Office, which prosecuted the case, which began as an FBI investigation out of the Oklahoma City Joint Terrorism Task Force.

“There’s multiple factors that go into charging decisions. She wasn’t charged and we can’t go beyond that.”

Immigrations and Customs Enforcement would not comment on why it took five years to investigate the couple's marriage.

As recently as five weeks ago, on Sept. 21, 2010, Tejada appeared as a guest on a Spanish-language radio program in her official capacity as a spokeswoman for Harry Reid.

Monday evening, Reid’s spokesman Jim Manley said Tejada was no longer employed by Reid’s office. When asked when Tejada left Reid’s services, the spokesman had no comment.

Manley provided this statement to FoxNews.com:

“Our office was not previously aware of these allegations and, following an internal investigation, the staffer at issue is no longer with our office. The conduct alleged, which took place several years before the staffer worked for Senator Reid, was clearly wrong. But the bottom line remains that this story was a desperation measure by partisan Republicans, who have stooped to slinging mud about junior staffers to score points in the waning days of her campaign.”

In court documents, Tejada, who was also the Press Secretary of Hispanic Media for the Senate Majority Conference Committee, is referred to as “an uncharged coconspirator in the crime of perjury, filing false immigration documents, the crime of sham marriage.”

According to interviews and court records obtained by FoxNews.com, Tejada knowingly filed false documents with the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services; lied in in-person interviews with ICE and FBI agents; and submitted fraudulent visa application affidavits and marriage license documents — all in attempt to use her status as an American citizen to get Tarhini permanent residency.


As a result of her actions, according to court documents, Tarhini was able to obtain a work permit.

“I don’t honestly know the reason why they chose to prosecute Bassam and not her,” said Jeffrey Byers, Tarhini’s criminal attorney.

“I don’t think they could’ve prosecuted the case without one of the two of them saying something, but I suspect they chose to work with the American citizen other than Bassam.”

A Justice Department source familiar with the investigation said:

"As exhibited in the court documents, the case prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's office in Oklahoma City was a straightforward case involving two individuals who entered into a fraudulent marriage during college in order for one to evade immigration laws and obtain lawful residence."

Tarhini entered the U.S. in 2000 on a student visa to attend Oklahoma City University, where Tejada was also a student. They became friends and married in September 2003 so he could avoid compulsory service in the Lebanese National Army, Tejada later told officials. She was 21 years old at the time; he was 30.

Click here to see a copy of Tejada and Tarhini's marriage certificate.

Two months after their marriage, Tejada submitted an affidavit sponsoring Tarhini’s request for adjustment of status, affirming on his I-485 application for a green card — under penalty of perjury — that she was his wife.

Court records show that Tejada signed numerous affidavits fraudulently
representing her marriage, including forms documenting her financial and employment information along with a signed obligation to support Tarhini.

As part of the process, documents show, she and Tarhini attended an August 31, 2004, meeting at Citizenship and Immigration Services in Oklahoma City, where they misrepresented their marriage to immigration officials.

The next year, Tarhini stayed in Oklahoma while Tejada moved to Washington D.C., where she began working as a spokeswoman for the National Council of La Raza, court and public records show.

In 2008, five years after he filed his visa application, Tarhini filed a suit against ICE officials to force a decision regarding the application — a strategy commonly employed when visa decisions appear to be taking an inordinate amount of time.

In 2008, sources with knowledge of the case told FoxNews.com, the FBI — working with the Oklahoma City Joint Terrorism Task Force — sent what’s called a collateral request to ICE, asking them to track down Tejada to interview her about Tarhini.

At this point, Tarhini was a subject of interest in an Oklahoma JTTF investigation, sources said.

In May or June 2008, a source told FoxNews.com, Tejada was interviewed by ICE and FBI agents in Washington, and she maintained that her marriage was legitimate.

In October 2008, Tejada began working for Reid.

On Nov 3, 2008, ICE and FBI agents re-interviewed Tejada in Washington, according to documents and interviews. This time, sources said, agents presented a slew of evidence against her and Tarhini, and Tejada broke down and confessed that her marriage was a lie, carried out to get Tarhini U.S. residency.

According to court records, she also told authorities that she and Tarhini had never dated nor consummated their marriage.

She told officials that she and Tarhini had discussed divorce, but they agreed to wait a while longer — until December 2008 — to see if his visa would be approved, records state.

In the presence of the federal agents, Tejada withdrew her visa petition for Tarhini, stopping his application to become a permanent resident, and signed a sworn affidavit saying that the marriage was a sham.

Tejada, according to sources with knowledge of the meeting, expressed concern about her job and said she was worried about Reid's reaction to her sham marriage. The federal agents told her she had an obligation to tell Reid, and sources said they believed she would inform her boss.

The highest level of management inside the Department of Homeland Security was aware that she worked for Reid, multiple sources confirmed, and following protocol, the majority leader should have been informed of the investigation through those channels, as well.


But in July 2009, when an ICE agent testifying at Tarhini’s preliminary deportation hearing was asked specifically about Tejada’s employer, the agent did not say it was the U.S. Senate.

ICE Special Agent Rebecca Perkins: “Currently she is employed with the — a Hispanic center organization.”

Tarhini's Defense Counsel, Jeffrey Byers: “Is that La Raza? Does that sound familiar?"

Perkins: “I don’t know.”

Byers: “It’s a — it’s a — it's something that is a public service group for the Hispanic community. Is that a fair statement, or something to that degree?”

Perkins: “Yes”

According to sources with knowledge of the November 2008 meeting, Tejada also told ICE and FBI agents that she was concerned about some of Tarhini’s associates, including the best man at her wedding, a Pakistani national named Amer Awli, whom she described as “very secretive.” Awli's current whereabouts are unknown.

Following Tarhini’s arrest in 2009, he was interviewed by FBI agents who sources say asked about his ties to extremists groups. Some sources said they determined he did not have ties to any terror group, but other sources close to the case said that could not be ruled out.

“Not all of my cases involve the FBI,” said Tarhini’s immigration attorney, Timothy Lee Cook. “Certainly, there was something out there that caught their attention.”

When asked what that might be, Cook said: “FBI’s not going to tell anybody that. And believe me, I asked.”

FBI spokesman Paul Bresson told FoxNews.com via email, “We have no comment.”

ICE provided details of Tarhini’s deportation but referred additional questions to the Western District of Oklahoma's U.S. Attorney's Office.

On March 20, 2009, Tarhini’s visa application for status as a lawful permanent resident was denied due to fraud and misrepresentation of his marriage to Tejada, court records state.

That same day, Tarhini was administratively arrested by ICE "due to failure to maintain his non-immigrant student status and fraudulent marriage," court records state. "He was no longer attending the Oklahoma City University, thus violating his immigration status."

In August 2009 Tarhini was indicted on two felony charges: Entering into a marriage to evade immigration laws, and subscribing to false statements. As part of a plea deal last November, he pleaded guilty to the first charge, and the second was dropped.

Tarhini was sentenced to time served and three years' supervised release. ICE spokeswoman Gillian Brigham confirmed to FoxNews.com that Tarhini was “removed” from the U.S. on March 3, 2010.

Tejada made $52,451.60 last year working for Reid.

Last month Tejada spoke in her official capacity as Spokesperson, Office of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, as a guest on a Spanish-language radio program’s immigration-themed special on the DREAM Act, which included a section in which the host answered listeners’ questions “about the do’s and don’ts of applying for residency and naturalization.”


Tejada filed for divorce, “alleging incompatibility,” on March 16, 2010. The divorce was finalized on July 6.

Tejada did not return requests for comment on this article.

.



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)11/19/2010 5:10:49 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Reid wants to force judicial votes during the lameduck

By: David Freddoso
Online Opinion Editor
11/17/10 5:10 PM EST

The Blog of the Legal Times notes that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., wants to force cloture votes on five controversial judicial nominees:


<<< John McConnell Jr., a Motley Rice partner who’s been nominated for federal district court in Rhode Island. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is opposing McConnell’s nomination, citing his work as a plaintiffs’ lawyer on lead paint litigation and other cases….

Goodwin Liu for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit,

Edward Chen for the Northern District of California…

Louis Butler for the Western District of Wisconsin.

Judge Robert Chatigny for the 2nd Circuit, is pending before the Senate Judiciary Committee. A committee vote is planned for Thursday. >>>


A few highlights: Chatigny is a judicial disaster waiting to happen, and so a lame duck is probably the only way he ever gets confirmed. McConnell is a trial lawyer who made a mint with lead-paint lawsuits and poured so much money back into the Democratic Party that one cannot deny the appearance that he’s buying a judgeship. Liu is controversial for simple, ideological reasons, and I’m less familiar with the other two.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: washingtonexaminer.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)3/10/2011 7:12:54 AM
From: Sully-1 Recommendation  Respond to of 35834
 
Cowboy Poetry [a la Harry Reid]



Michael Ramirez

creators.com



To: Sully- who wrote (29259)3/29/2011 10:15:13 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Harry Reid ‘Defends’ Social Security

By Andrew Stiles
The Corner
March 29, 2011 10:04 A.M.

With House Republicans poised to address entitlements in their 2012 budget — to be released in early April — and the so-called “Gang of Six” locked in negotiations over how to restore fiscal sanity to the federal budget, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) is ramping up his so-called “defense” of Social Security.

Reid led a rally in the Capitol on Monday to protest cuts to the country’s largest entitlement program, accounting for roughly one-fifth of the federal budget. Of course, by “cuts” he really means “any changes whatsoever,” even modest reforms to ensure the program’s long-term survival. In addition to being wedded to the (false) claim that Social Security does not contribute to the country’s fiscal problems, Reid is utterly nonplussed by the program’s looming insolvency (in 2037) — if nothing is done to reform the program before then, recipients will have their benefits automatically cut by 25 percent. That doesn’t seem to bother Reid — he told rally-goers the very notion that Social Security is going bankrupt is “an outright lie.” In fact, Reid has said he’s not willing to discuss any changes to Social Security until “two decades from now.”

Reid’s stance puts him at odds with not only a majority of Republicans, but also with members of his own party. Moderate Democrats in the House like Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D., Md.) and Chris Van Hollen (D., Md.), ranking member on the House Budget Committee, have acknowledged that Social Security needs fixing and have spoken out in favor of reform, as have several of Reid’s colleagues in the Senate. Even Sen. Bill Nelson (D., Fla.), up for reelection in 2012 (in Florida!) has expressed a willingness to consider reforms to Social Security.

Meanwhile, the four Senate representatives who served on President Obama’s bipartisan deficit commission — Tom Coburn (R., Okla.), Mike Crapo (R., Idaho), Kent Conrad (D., N.D.), and Dick Durbin (D., Ill.) — have teamed up with Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R., Ga.) and Mark Warner (D., Va.) to try and negotiated a long-term budget compromise based on the commission’s recommendations, which include reforms to Social Security such as raising the retirement age to 69 by the year 2075 and means testing of benefits.

Reid does have a likely ally in Durbin, who has come under intense pressure from the likes of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) to eschew the the commission’s “everything on the table” approach by leaving Social Security untouched. Durbin recently told National Review Online that including Social Security reform as part of a broad budget resolution would inhibit their ability to 60 votes in the Senate. “I’ve said to them, ‘We can stand by our guns and put it in and end up with 30 people instead of 60 supporting what we’re doing,’ but I don’t want to see that happen,” he says. “I’ve received a lot of expressions of concern in the Democratic caucus about including Social Security reform. Now, whether we can find a way to bridge that and resolve it, I can’t say, but we’re working on it.”

Sens. Tom Harkin (D., Iowa), Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), Al Franken (D., Minn.), and Richard Blumenthal (D., Conn.) also appeared at Monday’s rally, which had an air of religious revival to it that bordered on surreal. It seemed at times like a conservative parody of what a liberal rally to “save” Social Security might look like. For instance: the testimony on the effects of Social Security on the LGBT community. At one point, Harkin proudly described the way his father kept three portraits prominently displayed in the family home — one of Jesus, one of the Pope, and one of Social Security architect FDR.

Harkin, like Reid, insisted that any changes to the program should be off limits. Actually, he did have one idea. Instead of controlling costs through lasting structural reform, he suggested that Congress simply cover the shortfall with higher taxes on the wealthy. “Raise the cap!” Harkin yelled. (Or was it “Raise the tax?”) Either way, the crowd soon joined in, chanting loudly in unison, and loving it.

This was exactly the sort of reaction feared by deficit commission co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson. “There plenty of people in this city who hope and pray we don’t do anything to Social Security,” Simpson said recently at a Capitol Hill press conference. “The word is solvency, it doesn’t have anything to do with cutting out old ladies or old men, torturing children or throwing bed pans out of hospitals, it has to do with taking a public system that people are truly dependent on and making it solvent so it doesn’t go broke.”

Below is a video of Bowles and Simpson testifying before the Senate Budget Committee. They are being questioned by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) who has his own personal account of how Social Security helped his family (Democrats aren’t the only ones!). However, Graham doesn’t exactly see eye to eye with his Democratic colleagues on this issue. Here he is pointing out that not only is fixing Social Security an imperative step to take on the road to fiscal sanity, but the reforms required to achieve long-term solvency are actually quite simple and their effects quite minimal:

Graham Questions Debt Comission Co-Chairs

Graham: Can you imagine a budget being generated by a Republican or Democrat that doesn’t have meaningful entitlement reform, and that being a serious effort to solve our financial difficulties?

Bowles: No.

Graham: Can you imagine any scenario where we can save Social Security from impending massive cuts or any entitlement program without adjusting the age of eligibility?

Simpson: I think it’s impossible.

Graham: Can you imagine a scenario of saving Social Security from bankruptcy or major cuts without some form of means testing of benefits?

Bowles: Arithmetically you can you do it, but it’s not what we would recommend.

Graham: Would both of you urge congress to take up Social Security reform as part of this effort to bring about fiscal sanity?

Bowles: Absolutely, unequivocally yes.

Simpson: Got to.

Harry Reid: “Get back to me in 20 years.”

.