Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Winn who wrote (1096)	10/24/1997 2:32:00 PM
From: Mike Winn	Respond to of 60323

[OFF TOPIC] This is another example of a CFO who shoot himself in the foot and there is no truth to what he was saying: (From Motley Fool's lunch time news) ======================= FOOL PLATE SPECIAL An Investment Opinion by Alex Schay Cymer Shines Skittish investors encouraged by institutional downgrades chose to dump the stock of excimer laser company CYMER INC. (Nasdaq: CYMI) (N) (S) at the end of last month on fears that a massive production ramp-up (to accommodate an industry-wide shift to 0.25-micron chips) was creating problems for its semiconductor equipment company customers. Rumors began to circulate that Cymer's major customers were suffering technical problems related to its lasers after the company pulled out of an appearance at a Needham & Co. semiconductor equipment conference. Senior vice president and chief financial officer William Angus proclaimed darkly at the time that the company had to make "some adjustments in [its] operating plans for the remainder of [its] quarter," adding that the development "created more risk." Of course, anything with even a remote possibility of affecting near-term performance sends investors scrambling for the exits, as evidenced by Cymer's 18% drop on the day of the announcement. Analysts often adopt roles akin to economists -- a few cited the development at Cymer as a leading indicator for an eventual decline. For example, the Montgomery Securities downgrade to "hold" from "buy" came about as a result of analyst Brett Hodess expressing concerns that "technical problems at (customers) Nikon and Canon could cause further push backs in laser orders." Now, this is an altogether rationale conclusion, but it also reflects the constant information driven balancing act that is a Wall Street imperative. Cymer, however, came up with a response last night, reporting third-quarter revenue of almost $57.5 million, roughly three times the company's sales of $18.2 million in the same period last year. Net income per share came in at $0.23, topping estimates for $0.21. William Angus was quoted as saying, "Yeah, we had a pushout, and we had increased operating risks. But the results speak for themselves." Cymer also issued a rare short-term forecast: "Based on our Sept. 30, 1997 backlog and significant orders received since the close of the third quarter, and on customer forecasts, we currently expect continued sequential revenue growth for at least the next two quarters." Cymer shot up $3 3/32 to $29 1/2 at the open on the news, heartening investors that bought after last month's sell off who were optimistic about Cymer's virtual monopolistic market share for excimer lasers. However, things immediately took a turn for the worst as Cymer was dragged down by UBS Securities. Analyst Mark FitzGerald downgraded five semiconductor capital equipment stocks because of concern "about the impact on business from the Asian currency crisis." Cymer wasn't on the hit list, but its record results were dampened by the news, presenting another opportunity for investors to examine the reality of Cymer's business position.