Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (46346)	2/12/2009 5:21:25 PM
From: Roebear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218883

Jay, I will, as I often do, follow your wise recommendation behind door #4 "something does not compute; getgold, pileplatinum, sourcesilver" Thanks for pointing out the high odds news. I will point out that Science Fiction once again has anticipated the "non-sequitor" news: en.wikipedia.org ggg Roebear

To: TobagoJack who wrote (46346)	2/12/2009 8:18:46 PM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218883

Let's assume the collision was intentional. If you had arranged the collision, you would want to observe it. Note that collision took place over Siberia, not Hawaii or Florida. I am still inclinded towards 1) instead of 3) *************** Another view - A few months ago, China cause two of their satellites to collide, demonstrating their capability. Later, the US hit an old US satellite using a Standard missle. If Russia caused this, it shows they also have an anti-satellite capability. Someone needs to tell the Russians: you are supposed to take out your own satellites.