SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (456262)2/13/2009 12:56:57 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575558
 
>> Yep. Under Bush, though, it was centralized in the White House.

If you're going to make these accusations it would help if you would at least suggest SOMETHING about what you're talking about.

While I know that you draw a lot of irrational conclusions, at least we would have some idea where you're headed.

That is, if you'd like to have a little credibility. Personally, I don't care or anything.



To: combjelly who wrote (456262)2/13/2009 12:57:37 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575558
 
Yeah Bush gerrymandered MD so it went from 4-4 to 6 dems-2 repubs. My rep has never been to my county



To: combjelly who wrote (456262)2/13/2009 3:00:48 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575558
 
"Gerrymandering has gone on for years and I generally don't like it."

Yep. Under Bush, though, it was centralized in the White House.

And unfortunately, the Dems are not going to stop gerrymandering. Hopefully, with Obama's influence, there may be more equity in the process but that's probably doubtful.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News