Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (154876)	2/15/2009 6:41:00 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

There are in real life, more potential sources than a parent. But you're asking if there were a case of only one parental donor and the donation could be done with no harm to the parental donor, would I consider punishing the parent legally? Maybe. I sure wouldn't rule it out. I'd be willing to let legislatures hash it out. But the point I'm getting at is, from the standpoint of abortion or "choice" supporters like yourself, wouldn't you agree: - a parent who refused a donation and damned his or her child to death, or - a parent who harms her child by alcohol and drug use during pregnacy is perfectly okay both morally and legally. After all, its the parents body, isn't it, and the child has no right to life?