Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (184440)	2/17/2009 3:56:44 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Jeez...the rally went thud...back to -277. Wha' happened? No rescue by the stroke of the pen?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (184440)	2/17/2009 4:06:19 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

do you know what the details are on this Stanford (no relation to the university apparently) Fraud charge? Its being covered like another Madoff. Stanford was a great set of analysts on the early days of google. They got it right consistently. Hints of Madoff: SEC Charges Stanford With ‘Massive Fraud’ Posted by Dan Slater Let’s head to Antigua for the latest example of alleged financial fraud. This morning, the Journal reported that depositors from as far away as Colombia have begun arriving in the island nation, seeking to withdraw their money from an offshore bank under investigation by U.S. state and federal authorities. blogs.wsj.com