Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Markas who wrote (8522)	10/24/1997 5:52:00 PM
From: I Am John Galt	Respond to of 55532

So, you're saying we're actually boarding Conair as opposed to RMIL Air? Do we need parachutes? Who is flying this thing? Matty Gregg

To: Markas who wrote (8522)	10/24/1997 5:53:00 PM
From: sandshark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

I think it comes from CON-stipation.

To: Markas who wrote (8522)	10/24/1997 5:58:00 PM
From: Mr. Stress	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

What CON-ARTIST convinced you there isn't a GOD?? I noticed you call RMIL a scam in your profile. Any proof?

To: Markas who wrote (8522)	10/24/1997 6:03:00 PM
From: Typhoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Are you suggesting that someone here is a con-artist? And if so, who? Please be honest with us on this point. Otherwise, I fail to see what your interesting definition of a con-artist has to do with RMIL. Typhoon #55 I don't think this is the place to discuss religious beliefs, but you brought it up. I happen to believe in the God of Israel, and Jesus, and prophets and spirits, and heaven and hell. If that makes me a fool, by definition, then put me on the fool list. Fool #1 I've been conned into eternal salvation, and loving it!!

To: Markas who wrote (8522)	10/24/1997 6:17:00 PM
From: Stocking CK	Respond to of 55532

Bravo Bravo Bravo BrraaaVo..., You just passed the 4th Grade ,. You can look up the reference of a Word. I'm glad I have a 4th grader here to help me with my stocks. CK - Just Bee

To: Markas who wrote (8522)	10/24/1997 6:21:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Markas, your definition is wrought with fault. The prefix 'con' = 'against' by DEFINITION it is the antithesis of what you state. In latin, which is what it is derived, it is subjugated to -fidant/-dence ..inflicting your connotation as an anomoly at best. Con-vict, subjagating it to -vict, or AGAINST / VICTIM is the proper deriviation. I would suggest you are Short on RMIL, are here to discredit Riley, and in truth , only discredit yourself w/ your silly definitions. The french have assimilated 'con' -ard, tu piges?, Pugs