SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (459113)2/24/2009 4:35:40 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1575047
 
Schumer?? Schumer caused some of this mess when he caused that run on that bank. Schumer is one dumb partisan fukk



To: tejek who wrote (459113)2/24/2009 4:53:47 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575047
 
If this provision does shove it down the throats of governors who are of higher integrity than the Democrats, then I'm sure they'll go ahead and take it.

This is what you call an "unfunded mandate".

It seems Obama wants to return to the pre-Clinton welfare state.



On a related note, Jindal used to think very differently about unemployment insurance. House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) noted today, "In the wake of a natural disaster after Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast in 2005, then-Congressman Jindal cosponsored and supported legislation to expand unemployment benefits and inject federal dollars into Louisiana's unemployment trust fund. Yet today in the face of a financial disaster and record unemployment, he opposes similar action under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. What changed?"


This, of course, is typical of the liberal lie. Don't present all the facts. As usual.

Of course, when you had a natural disaster that destroyed all business in the region, you would want more unemployment money. Nothing wrong with that, if you're going to pay into the federal fund, that's what it is there for.

This situation is entirely different. But you being an idiot, would not recognize that, would you?



To: tejek who wrote (459113)2/25/2009 7:04:33 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575047
 
What a good question.

Politics of the NOParty of course...I am sure you watched the "mr rogers" performance last night? Don't think he did himself any favors.

Al