Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (459131)	2/24/2009 5:33:19 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1574854

"If you answered no, you are rich compared to the liberals on this forum." Your information source is in error. Either that, or you just pulled it out of your ass. Given your proclivities, I'd say that info is a biohazard.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (459131)	2/24/2009 6:24:29 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574854

Peter, > Do you owe more than you have in assets? Actually, I think I do, considering the value of my house these days. > If you answered no, you are rich compared to the liberals on this forum. I'm "rich" because I save up enough money to go traveling once in a while. Just ask Bentway and RW: Message 25209650 Message 25209700 I'm "rich" because I'm not suffering at my job like RW and SilentZ, and because I don't directly employ people: Message 25436164 Message 25424736 I'm "rich" because I don't fear losing my job or my house: Message 25432542 I'm "rich" because I choose not to give in to hysteria. I choose not to compare myself to rich bastards like Donald Trump or Paris Hilton. I choose to live conservatively, spend responsibly, and give thanks in everything that I do. Am I "rich"? You bet I am. And to liberals, that makes me the #1 target for taxes and "share the wealth" policies. Tenchusatsu