Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (33281)	2/24/2009 11:22:38 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 71588

"From the beginning the evidence I posted was about the percentage of an individuals income paid out in taxes." No, It was not. Re: "no need to infer that, or follow links to get it...." Then why the Hell did you SAY THAT? *"One article I linked two and quoted indirectly... Even if you don't like or don't understand the indirect reference...."* But --- enough of this bull shit back and forth, he said / no he didn't crap. Back it up and START FRESH if you want to make a point or an argument ABOUT THE OPINION PIECE I ORIGINALLY POSTED. (I am no longer am interested in following you into the weeds somewhere unrelated.) If you want to argue about what was in the ORIGINAL POST --- then let's see it fresh and spelled out in some kind of clear and succinct form. I couldn't care less about 20 pages of totally wasted "he said, no he didn't" kind of pointless back-and-forth. If you want to start with a clear point, directly referring to the original article, then let's do so. If not, then I'm staying out of the weeds.