Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ProDeath who wrote (15796)	2/24/2009 10:41:28 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50250

But, as tooearly asked, is it OK to send a drone w/bomb to kill innocent Pakis? Please explain the difference to me.

To: ProDeath who wrote (15796)	2/25/2009 2:42:42 AM
From: NOW	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50250

the indiscriminate killing of civilians is a war crime.

To: ProDeath who wrote (15796)	2/25/2009 8:45:06 AM
From: Mike M2	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50250

Your WWII comparison is absurd. First of all the victors are the judges - you will never see Bush / Cheney indicted period. The Japanese war crimes were atrocious - Rape of Nan King - , Bio-weapons experiments at Unit 731, the Bataan Death March , the death rate of US POWs held by Japanese was 27 % vs 4% for those in German captivity. The Japanese would target medics in battle. You need to read your history - your comments demonstrate a monumental ignorance of the scope and size of the atrocities and suffering during WWII. en.wikipedia.org