Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energyplay who wrote (46830)	2/25/2009 12:04:36 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 218632

In 2002, the world had technology that would take ten years to digest. (I think you and me discussed this sometime in the past). That in telecoms is certain. Many technologies that were out of the labs only now are being commercially exploited. I also wrote (Frank Coluccio Thread) that it will take up to 2017 to fork lift the infrastructure built in the 80's. That means the telephone switches that are installed in the Central Offices around the world. What has been developed are refinements of the technologies that were not deployed 2001 to 2003 due to the tech bubble bursting. China got a plethora of new technologies developed during the tech bubble. That is different than Japanese post-war copy cat, trial and error strategy. It was the set of circumstances that favored China: Here is a bunch of technologies that needs plenty cost-effective engineers in an environment not poisoned by the tech bubble. Noe that the Chinese are develping much electro-electronics prducts. Not much in other areas because there were not an oversupply of those technologies: -agtech, materials tech, medtech, food tech- that were not over invested continued.