Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ProDeath who wrote (15800)	2/25/2009 1:44:58 PM
From: Broken_Clock	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50280

For one, we have several fewer unindicted war criminals holding prominent positions in our government as compared to say, October 2008. === The key point here is "unindicted". Obama has Eric Holder as Atty General. Shall I summarize his complicity in the protection of his client that provided money and arms for the slaughter of Colombian peasants for you? Obama has refused to prosecute any Bush criminals. Doesn't that mean he condones their actions? I say yes, because he is going to continue their policies. The only reason sending a drone bomb into a Pakistani wedding party isn't a war crime is because the gov't of Pakistan has neither the balls nor an effective avenue to challenge the might US army/gov't on this issue. The very same action, 911, caused such a spasm in this country that we've invaded two countries over the issue, neither of which had any fault or connection to the action.