Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (459241)	2/25/2009 10:16:52 AM
From: tejek	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574102

i>I don't get it.......they have several ways to go....pick one and go with it. As discussed, I disagree. If it takes another month to get it right, then take a month. This is too important and there is too much data. They are first collecting info with the "stress test" so they know the extent of the problem. That's the right thing to do. Can't solve a problem unless you know what it is. The problem is we don't even know what they will do after they give a bank the stress test. What happens if a bank fails? IS there a run on that bank? Does the stock sell off to zero? What happens to the assets? These are the kinds of details people are looking for. They are not operating on a dummy....there are real people involved with fears and concerns. Its not rocket science........there is no reason why these issues can't be determined now.