SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ron who wrote (161784)2/26/2009 6:53:19 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362169
 
Obama Wants $634 Billion to Start on Health Care (Update2)

By Aliza Marcus and Alex Nussbaum

Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama proposed spending $634 billion to expand U.S. health care, financing the “down payment” with increased taxes on wealthy Americans and less government money for some drugmakers and health insurers.

The budget outline, presented today to Congress, calls for spending the money over 10 years while offsetting about half by limiting tax deductions for couples making more than $250,000 a year. The proposal would stop “waste” in government payments to Humana Inc. and companies like it that provide special plans for the elderly. Managed-care stocks plummeted.

Obama said Congress will have to come up with more money to pay the full cost of making health care affordable to all and available to the 46 million Americans now without medical insurance. He said in the budget plan he was open to “all serious ideas,” including taxing employer-provided health benefits, something he opposed during his campaign. Economists say the full cost of covering everyone may reach $1.5 trillion.

“We are making a historic commitment to comprehensive health-care reform,” Obama said in remarks today in Washington. “It’s a step that will not only make families healthier and companies more competitive, but over the long term, it will also help us bring down our deficit.”

The plan calls for requiring Humana, UnitedHealth Group Inc., WellPoint Inc. and other insurers to offer competitive bids to offer what are known as Medicare Advantage plans, which bundle benefits and add more services than what the elderly get when they obtain coverage directly from the government.

Humana, Lilly Drop

Humana dropped 19 percent, or $5.72, to $23.64 at 4:15 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange trading, leading a 12 percent decline in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of managed-care providers.

The budget also would squeeze discounts to drugmakers, among them Eli Lilly & Co., that supply medicines to the poor through the joint U.S. state Medicaid program. Lilly fell 4.7 percent after a spokesman for the Indianapolis-based company said it stands to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in yearly sales if the Obama plan is approved.

Obama’s proposed budget would raise rebates drugmakers must provide to supply medicines for Medicaid patients, to 22 percent of the manufacturer’s price from 15 percent.

Drug Savings

The Medicare proposal would save $175 billion over 10 years, starting with $11.2 billion in 2012, according to the budget plan. The insurance companies are paid on average 14 percent more than it costs Medicare to provide benefits directly, according to government estimates, and Obama said in the proposal “it’s time to stop this waste.”

Higher-income beneficiaries of Medicare prescription-drug plans would pay higher premiums in 2011, according to the proposal.

The Medicaid drug proposal would save the government $19.5 billion between 2010 and 2019, according to the budget document. Obama also called for holding down medical costs by easing the way for generic copies of more expensive drugs made through biotechnology.

The insurance industry said Americans 65 and older would lose benefits under the Medicare Advantage proposal.

“A significant portion of his proposed savings will come at the expense of high quality, high-value health care coverage for millions of America’s seniors,” said Cheryl Leamon, a spokeswoman for WellPoint Inc., the second-largest health insurer by revenue, in an e-mailed statement.

‘Increasing Taxes’

The House Republican leader, John Boehner of Ohio, said in a statement that “increasing taxes during a recession, especially on small businesses,” was an irresponsible way to fund more health care.

The budget, along with Obama’s proposals to use more electronic records, will ultimately help industry, said David Snow, chief executive officer of Medco Health Solutions Inc., the largest U.S. manager of employee drug plans. The generic- biotechnology proposal offers “an enormous opportunity” for savings, he said.

The proposals are “a starting place to start debating real health care reform in this country and we welcome it,” he said by telephone.

Obama also proposed that hospitals get “bundled” payments for treating patients, instead of getting reimbursed for each procedure done, which health-policy experts say can encourage providers to do more to get more money. Hospitals with high rates of readmissions within the same 30-day period will be penalized. This would save about $26 billion over the 10-year period.

Cancer Research, Generic Drugs

Cuts to Medicare payments for home health care “to align with costs” would generate $37 billion more, according to the budget.

Cancer research funding would receive more than $6 billion in increased funding under the budget proposal, reflecting Obama’s pledge before Congress to this week to start a new effort “to conquer a disease that has touched the lives of nearly every American, including me.”

The funds would come on top of $10 billion provided in the recently signed stimulus bill to support new research at the National Institutes of Health.

To speed development of generic drugs, the administration’s budget requests $20 million in 2013 to create a pathway for FDA approval of generic versions of biologic drugs, which are made from living organisms. This change would save the government about $9 billion over a 10-year period, the budget said.

Generic Biologics

Letting generic-drug companies make their own versions of medicines produced by biotechnology companies like Genentech Inc. and Amgen Inc. could save $25 billion in the first decade they’re on the market, the Congressional Budget Office, a research agency of Congress, estimates.

Generic versions of biologics would be prohibited for a period “consistent with” current limits of about seven years, the administration proposed. Biotechnology companies have been pushing for 12 years of exclusivity.

“It’s important and sets a marker, but there are clearly going to be proposals for a longer exclusivity period, and that’s where I expect some negotiation,” said Mark McClellan, a former Food and Drug Administration commissioner now at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

The budget also proposes barring biologic drugmakers from “reformulating” existing products into new products to restart the exclusivity process, known as ‘ever greening.’

Generics Market

The administration said it would support limits on agreements between brand-name drugmakers and their generic competitors that delay the entry of low-cost copies onto the market. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has been stymied by the courts in its efforts to block some agreements, and has said legislation may be needed.

More than $1 billion would go to boost food safety with steps to improve inspections, laboratory capacity and the domestic response to prevent and control foodborne illnesses, such as the salmonella outbreak that has killed nine since October.

President Bush’s 2009 budget request applied $662 million toward food safety.

To contact the reporters on this story: Aliza Marcus in Washington at amarcus8@bloomberg.net; Alex Nussbaum in New York anussbaum1@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: February 26, 2009 16:35 EST



To: Ron who wrote (161784)2/26/2009 8:22:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362169
 
Freeman's in

politico.com

The Obama administration has notified Congress that Chas Freeman has been appointed chairman of the National Intelligence Council, demonstrating a willingness to rebuff pro-Israel activists and an embrace of a more realist foreign policy line.

Freeman, who drew fire for defending the Chinese and Saudi governments, doesn't represent the mainstream of the administration. He's also a broadly knowledgeable, polyglot, experienced diplomat with many friends in foreign policy and intelligence circles, including Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair.

But his inclusion in an important, low-profile job represents, among other things, the vastly diminished sway of the neocons — long at odds with the professional intelligence community — who launched a concerted, public effort to torpedo the move.

"Ambassador Freeman will be responsible for overseeing the production of National Intelligence Estimates (NIE) and other Intelligence Community analytical products, providing substantive counsel to the DNI and senior policymakers on issues of top national security importance, reaching out to nongovernmental experts in academia and the private sector to broaden the Intelligence Community's perspective, and articulating substantive intelligence priorities and procedures to guide intelligence collection and analysis," says the notification, which lists his qualifications: "Ambassador Freeman brings a diverse background in defense, diplomacy, and intelligence to this position having served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, U.S. Ambassador to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Deputy Chief of Mission and Charge d'Affaires in Bangkok and Beijing, Director of Chinese Affairs at U.S. State Department, and Distinguished Fellow at the United States Institute of Peace and the Institute for National Security Studies. He received his J.D. from the Harvard School of Law."

By Ben Smith 02:58 PM February 26, 2009



To: Ron who wrote (161784)2/26/2009 9:06:47 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362169
 
Obama grasps healthcare reform

ft.com

Published: February 26 2009 19:30

The budget that Barack Obama’s administration released on Thursday is not settled policy. A multi-volume request to Congress comes in April and then Capitol Hill will go to work. This week’s blueprint matters, though, because it is a more detailed plan of the new president’s aims than we have so far seen. In a firmly left-leaning proposal, two things stand out.

First, Mr Obama is serious about comprehensive healthcare reform and hopes to make high-income households pay for it. This would be a bold project at any time, let alone when the public purse must contend with the demands of stimulus spending and financial stabilisation. Allowing for new bank bail-out money, the current year’s deficit is expected to be $1,750bn, more than 12 per cent of GDP. Undaunted, Mr Obama wants to set aside more than $600bn in tax increases and spending cuts over 10 years as a down payment on healthcare reform.

Second, revenues from a cap-and-trade system of carbon mitigation make their debut. The proceeds would be spent partly on making the tax credits in the fiscal stimulus, strongly tilted towards low-income households, permanent.

The US healthcare system is inequitable and inefficient: the need for reform is plain. Even so one must wonder at both the timing and the method of financing. Mr Obama’s plan to raise taxes on households earning more than $250,000 comes on top of the reversal of the Bush tax cuts after 2010. The savings of these households have already been destroyed by plunging share and house prices. Yet another income tax increase, with intimations of more to come – since the down payment covers less than half of the likely cost of healthcare reform – is not calculated to spur confidence.

The budget is questionable in other ways too. It aims to cut the deficit sharply by 2013. If the economy recovers briskly, that will happen by itself. If it does not, aiming to meet this target could be a mistake. Whether the budget is quite the promised benchmark of fiscal honesty is also doubtful. Some of the old trickery has gone, but these traditions die hard. Mr Obama raised eyebrows earlier by promising $2,000bn of budget “savings”. These turn out to be mainly tax increases, plus spending cuts against a bogus baseline of huge outlays in Iraq for all time.

Mainly, Mr Obama has served notice to those who thought he would slide away from the healthcare challenge. He judges this reform to be as important to his legacy as his management of the recession – and he is right. If he fails, it will not be out of timidity.