Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (69952)	2/27/2009 12:22:31 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

A Choice for Obama David Freddoso The Corner On Monday, Karl Rove was a no-show at a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee at which he had been subpoenaed to testify. The committee had issued a subpoena for Rove to testify on the U.S. Attorney firings. He has cited the Bush administration's claim of executive privilege as his reason for not testifying. If you haven't been following this affair over the last few weeks (or if you were out of the country, as I was), here is a brief look at what has happened. Obama must make up his mind in the next week whether to back the claim of executive privilege that is keeping Rove and two other former White House officials (Harriet Miers and Josh Bolten) from testifying. The D.C. Circuit Court has given the Obama administration until March 4 to weigh in. As Obama's counsel, Greg Craig put it two weeks ago, Obama is "sympathetic" to those wishing to grill Rove, but also "mindful as president of the United States not to do anything that would undermine or weaken the institution of the presidency. So, for that reason, he is urging both sides of this to settle." This is a clever way of masking what amounts to a serious dilemma for an opportunistic politician. If Obama backs the claim of privilege, he risks serious outrage and disappointment on the Left. If he does not, he cedes a significant amount of power, and his own decisions over the next four (or eight) years could be similarly dissected someday by his political enemies. Obama has never been known for making tough decisions on principle. (A possible exception was his October 2002 speech against the Iraq War, which his biographer David Mendell nonetheless attributes, in part, to Obama's already-planned 2004 Senate run.) Obama is hoping for Conyers and the former Bush advisors to reach a deal before he has to make this one. corner.nationalreview.com