SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (46925)2/27/2009 9:26:32 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 219525
 
TJ few day ago when you started posting your C-X post I asked you about EW - now it is clear that the $1000 mark for gold was not fundamental but pure EW event.

This does not reneged my assertion that GOLD is still cheap on a relative basis to historic price action (which should price gold well over $1,600 to $1,800) but no one can argue with the markets – therefore as mentioned before;

1. I would prefer PT
2. There are other commodities worth accumulating instead of gold



To: TobagoJack who wrote (46925)2/27/2009 11:43:37 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Respond to of 219525
 
All or nothing :O)



To: TobagoJack who wrote (46925)2/27/2009 12:50:38 PM
From: Follies  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219525
 
I have to ask , what is C-60?

eabcn.org ??

and what movie are you thinking of acting out?



To: TobagoJack who wrote (46925)2/27/2009 6:47:20 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219525
 
This is interesting :O) Message 25450924


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News