Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trey McAtee who wrote (22914)	10/24/1997 10:17:00 PM
From: DavidG	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 53903

Trey, << your denigrating of us using achilles, we were more accurate using it for EPS than ALL the analysts and you. >> As usual you are always getting things wrong, I have nothing against using Achilles, nor does anyone else I guess, the question is how does it relate to MUs asp???? How is it used to "so accurately calculate EPS"...and I am not being sarcastic. I truely believe Achilles is useful for a positive or negative indication but not much more unless you can show me. Also why is this simplistic approach so much better than the way analysts arrive at their numbers. Something is wrong if you really believe Spot and contract sales across many different memory products by MU can be reduced to Achilles quotes. You know... my feeling all the while is that you are not interested in answering anyones concerns...but just getting into a pi$$ing contest. I have seriously asked this question many times for my own edification and never got a satisfactory answer. If you can't answer...just say so.. I'll understand(especially since I don't know the answer...and I have had many years of math in college and graduate studies). Good Luck Trading DavidG And I am the first to admit I do not know how to come up with a better number than the aggregate professionals