Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (8037)	3/1/2009 10:48:41 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 103300

Thanks for the info... now let's be realistic, if you continue to tax them, they'll just move their money off shore, this has happened before and will happen again... how can obama slam those people for being successful by taxing them more when these are the very same people who create jobs and do all the hiring? It sounds schizophrenic, you hate them but expect them to create jobs for you... kinda nutty, no? GZ

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (8037)	3/1/2009 11:27:42 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

"The Republican base is now made up of the religious and neoconservative ideologues, and the uneducated white underclass with a token person of color or two up front on TV to obscure the all-white, all reactionary backward -- there-is-no-global-warming -- rube reality. Actual conservatives have long since fled. " "So, what is the problem with lying to our faces, say, claiming that all American's taxes are going up when 95% of American's taxes are going to go down? Why not claim Obama is a socialist, even if he's not? Why not say anything at all to drive our country into a pit when losing is seen as winning? That, is all the Republicans have to offer America: more lies on a path to destruction from which the Republican "leadership" plans to resurrect themselves and "save" America from Obama. "

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (8037)	3/2/2009 7:39:19 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 103300

So, why is obama already breaking his promise not to sign any earmark bills? Any explanations? TIA foxnews.com GZ