Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (15954)	3/2/2009 5:46:30 PM
From: NOW	12 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50386

we are not winning ANY of the battles. maybe a skirmish here and there but battles? NAME ONE! nothing substantive has been righted: no end of illegal spying on citizens, no end of extradition, no restoration of habeus, no end of giveaways to AIG, no end of bombing weddings, NADA

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (15954)	3/3/2009 7:12:35 AM
From: TH	1 Recommendation Respond to of 50386

SOTB, Interesting post, as always. Still, I've got to stick with my more basic plan. They do not want four digit gold for they need no competitors for the dollar because they must sell a mountain of treasuries. I think it is that simple. The government is actively selling gold, via their agents, and they will continue to do so and in force as gold creeps back up to four digits again. I do not know when and how we will break this cycle, but I do not foresee my clowngressman having anything positive to contribute to that effort. Maybe I'm just too much a cynic, for I believe gold should have crossed a grand a long time ago (for example, last year when the bailouts started). GT TH