Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (47172)	3/6/2009 12:23:23 AM
From: Maurice Winn	14 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219619

Blahblahblah, yes TJ, sure TJ, unlike the Beijing bandits who didn't just put their hand in the cookie jar but have grabbed the whole thing and declared it their private property to be doled out to themselves and buddies with unlimited self-dealing, not to be challenged for possession by way of elections, or other consideration of their right to rule. It's remarkably reminiscent of previous rule-by-Emperor. A self-perpetuating collection of courtiers all with their noses in the trough. And they want more! They want the high GDP per capita of Taiwan, as well as Hong Kong and might as well throw in Tibet, and how about those disputed islands? What did Chen get with his hand in the cookie jar, supposedly? A lunch he should have paid for himself or something equally trivial? It's amusing how you are an apologist for the biggest bandits on the planet. I guess you have to stay in good with them, all for one and one for all and the Devil take the hindmost etc. Travel in China could be difficult otherwise. Living in Hong Kong might be tenuous too. Many people have a short public existence in China if they are less than adulatory of the Beijing Bosses. Taiwanese chose to ditch Chen. China's serfs can't do the same to those in Beijing who are full of cookies. Mqurice