Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alphonse Viazzo who wrote (18103)	10/25/1997 12:31:00 PM
From: Larry S.	Respond to of 42771

Comments on NOVL: - Technically, NOVL is looking quite good. It has held up well in the sharp tech downturns this week, and showed signs of life moving from 9 to 9.50 when the market ran earlier this week. Short=term i expect a trading rane between 8.75 and 10. Larry

To: Alphonse Viazzo who wrote (18103)	10/25/1997 1:47:00 PM
From: Joe Antol	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42771

Alphonse, >> tang, <bought few hundred shares of NOVL today (AGAIN!)> As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly. --Proverbs 26:11<< ... Whenever trouble comes your way, let it be an opportunity for joy. For when your faith is tested, your endurance has a chance to grow -- James I:2:3 Regards, Joe...<although, that probably won't apply to me in about 2 weeks <G>> PS: Hey Rudy, FYI - The Crown Palace in Marlboro has gone "downhill" as of late --- IMO <smile>

To: Alphonse Viazzo who wrote (18103)	10/25/1997 6:39:00 PM
From: tang	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42771

Alphonse, you are short on Novell, I knew that a long time ago, I am long on Novell, so we are on a pair of parallel lines here, you are a fool if the game is over, and Novell goes up, you are wise if Novell goes to zero, at this stage, your opinion is worth as much as mine, not much, not less, 2 cents only ... sorry to disappoint you ... don't reply if you are a christian because I am not seeking argument here, simply don't have energy for you. Regards. Tang