Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GREATMOOD who wrote (6470)	10/25/1997 11:34:00 AM
From: Brander	Respond to of 25960

I doesn't make much sense to me, what Mr F said about CYMI. I don't see how he could say those things considering Cymer's earning rieport and their comments about the future. Mr F is essentially calling the company a liar. I felt fortunate to pick up a bunch of CYMI at 27 yesterday and still do; imtermediate to long term, Cymer looks strong to me. Brad

To: GREATMOOD who wrote (6470)	10/25/1997 11:47:00 AM
From: Jess Beltz	Respond to of 25960

I don't think Fleckenstein's comment will have ANY effect on Cymer whatsoever. Barrons has a real checkered past with this sort of thing. Another case in point is Conseco - a large insurer-reinsurer. Conseco had someone in their employ who they dismissed. This person later on became some kind of Wall Street personality, who bears a large grudge against Conseco. Barrons regularly interviews the guy, and he never misses a chance to diss Conseco - which has a long history now of doing very well for its shareholders. Why Barrons gives the jerk media time when he has little of value to say is beyond me, except that people who follow Barrons pay little enough attention to factual results that Barrons doesn't get marked to market (ie people dropping their subscriptions.) jess.