SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rock_nj who wrote (162658)3/9/2009 10:32:23 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361839
 
The bottom has got to be close. The markets continue to behave like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum because the global response to date has been too little, too late. China did the right thing with a stimulus package amounting to 16% of GDP over two years. But the US has so far come up with a package worth 6% of GDP over three years, which is clearly not enough. $881 billion sounds like a lot of money, but in this world it is only the down payment. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson promised to ring fence toxic assets but never delivered, buying into the banks instead. Policy makers are not equipped to deal with the globally synchronized nature of this melt down. In 1988 world trade accounted for only 5% of GDP. Last year it was 33%, but is going to hell in a hand basket with stunning speed. More global coordination is necessary, no matter how distasteful that may be.

By The Mad Hedge Fund Trader Mar 09 11:59 am

seekingalpha.com



To: Rock_nj who wrote (162658)3/9/2009 11:22:49 PM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation  Respond to of 361839
 
They went after assisted suicide in Ore., too...

High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law
6-3 majority says state powers trump federal rules; Roberts' first dissent

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court upheld Oregon’s one-of-a-kind physician-assisted suicide law Tuesday, rejecting a Bush administration attempt to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die.
msnbc.msn.com



To: Rock_nj who wrote (162658)3/10/2009 1:01:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361839
 
Hedge Funds May Cut a Record 20,000 Jobs as Losses Erode Fees

By Katherine Burton and Saijel Kishan

March 10 (Bloomberg) -- Hedge funds may cut 20,000 workers worldwide this year, a record 14 percent of the industry’s jobs, as investment losses and client withdrawals erode fees.

The dismissals will come on top of the 10,000 jobs that disappeared last year at the investment partnerships, according to estimates by New York-based Options Group, an executive-search firm. Employment peaked at 155,000 in 2007, and has since dropped to about 145,000, the firm said.

“Hiring activity is much reduced and it’s going to get worse,” said Hank Higdon, managing partner at Higdon Partners LLC, a New York-based search firm focused on financial services. “I don’t see markets improving at all.”

About 920 hedge funds, or 12 percent, closed last year, according to data compiled by Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research Inc. Of the 6,800 single-manager funds that remain, 70 percent lost money in 2008, meaning they can’t resume collecting performance fees until the losses are recouped. Those fees, generally 20 percent of investment profits, are the primary source of cash used to pay bonuses.

Hedge funds eliminated about 6.5 percent of jobs last year, when client assets fell 37 percent to $1.2 trillion from their peak in June, according to Hedge Fund Research. Banks and brokers have fired more than 272,450 workers, or 5.9 percent of their payrolls, since mid-2007, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Hedge-fund assets may fall an additional $250 billion, or 21 percent, this year, estimates Huw van Steenis, a financial- services analyst at Morgan Stanley in London. That would leave hedge funds, which cater to wealthy individuals and institutions, overseeing about $950 billion, the lowest since 2004.

Citadel, SAC Capital

Last year, Citadel Investment Group LLC, the Chicago-based firm run by Kenneth Griffin, cut about 150 people, or 11 percent of its workforce, as it exited investment areas including emerging markets and reinsurance. Griffin, 40, still employs 1,200 people at the firm, which manages $12 billion, and is hiring in its market-making business. The firm’s biggest funds lost about 55 percent in 2008.

Steve Cohen’s SAC Capital Advisors LP, based in Stamford, Connecticut, cut 100 people, or 13 percent of its staff. The reductions included fixed-income traders as Cohen, 52, scaled back bond investing in favor of trading stocks. He manages $12 billion.

There are some pockets of hiring, recruiters said.

Higdon Partners this year helped Breeden Capital Management LLC find a portfolio manager in London for its European stock fund. The Greenwich, Connecticut-based firm is run by Richard Breeden, former head of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Higdon also worked with New York-based Cantillon Capital Management LLC, founded by William von Mueffling, to hire a sales and marketing executive.

High-Frequency Trading

“Some funds are looking for investment people, maybe better analysts or portfolio managers,” said Higdon. There’s also a limited demand for distressed-debt managers, risk specialists, and marketing and sales people to help replace assets that were lost last year.

Several hedge funds are also looking for “high-frequency” traders, according to Brian Grover, founder of New York-based recruiting firm Broadreach Group.

High-frequency trading uses computer programs to buy and sell securities for time periods as short as 10 minutes. In volatile markets, such dealing can be profitable. Misha Malyshev, who was head of high-frequency trading at Citadel, quit last month after he helped to generate returns of 40 percent in 2008.

Hedge funds are also taking a longer time to fill the few positions they have, recruiters said.

“The hiring process is turning back to the 1990s, when candidates had 15 to 30 interviews before being hired,” said Michael Karp, chief executive officer of Options Group.

To contact the reporters on this story: Katherine Burton in New York at kburton@bloomberg.net; Saijel Kishan in New York at skishan@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: March 10, 2009 00:01 EDT



To: Rock_nj who wrote (162658)3/10/2009 4:10:34 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361839
 
Joseph Stiglitz calls for decisive action while Geithner tries to muddle through

dailykos.com



To: Rock_nj who wrote (162658)3/10/2009 6:22:39 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361839
 
Glass-Steagall’s Specter Returns to Haunt Wall Street

By Matthew Benjamin and Christine Harper

March 10 (Bloomberg) -- A decade after Wall Street killed off the Glass-Steagall Act that separated commercial banks from securities firms, its ghost has returned to haunt the financial industry.

Comments by Paul Volcker, the former Federal Reserve chief advising President Barack Obama, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair in the past week suggest it will become more costly for banks to remain in some of the areas they were let into with Glass-Steagall’s 1999 repeal, analysts said.

“The capital-market rules are going to change,” Brad Hintz, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in New York, said in a Bloomberg Television interview. For firms that remain banks, “it’s going to be much more difficult to trade in the illiquid parts of the market” beyond government and corporate bonds, and to borrow to finance investments, he said.

Hedge funds will increasingly take over business in riskier areas such as emerging-market and distressed securities, predicted Hintz, who served as chief financial officer of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. from 1996 to 1998.

By removing the barrier between everyday banking such as lending and deposit-taking and riskier areas such as derivatives trading, Glass-Steagall’s 1999 repeal helped create the current crisis, according to some policy makers and politicians.

‘Never’ Again

“You can’t break the bank and lose everyone’s” pension investments “without expecting a real food fight with respect to laying blame and trying to fix the financial system so this never happens again,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York.

Volcker called for a “two-tier” financial system that would limit risk-taking by the most systemically important firms, at a conference in New York March 6. Bair said in an interview with CBS that aired March 8 that Congress should curtail the size of the biggest banks.

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will present his views on overhauling the industry’s rules today. He is scheduled to speak to the Council on Foreign Relations at 8:30 a.m. in Washington.

Many on Wall Street are now resigned to jettisoning some sources of revenue and paring back others in order to comply with a new regulatory regime.

“Some of the businesses that we’ve been in in the past are going to be curtailed,” Morgan Stanley Chief Executive Officer John Mack said on Feb. 23.

Obama has told his aides to work with Congress on shaping proposals for regulatory changes within weeks.

Obama’s Criticism

Obama himself has decried the way Glass-Steagall was undone, saying it left a regulatory vacuum that contributed to the current crisis.

“A regulatory structure set up for banks in the 1930s needed to change,” then-candidate Obama said in a March 27, 2008, speech at New York City’s Cooper Union. “But by the time the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed in 1999, the $300 million lobbying effort that drove deregulation was more about facilitating mergers than creating an efficient regulatory framework.”

Obama referred to a campaign by companies such as Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. and Aetna Inc. in the late 1990s to overturn the law. Its demise allowed banks, insurance companies and securities firms to integrate and compete with one another.

Citicorp, a commercial bank, and insurance company Travelers Group Inc. announced a merger in 1998 that needed Glass-Steagall’s repeal to become legal. The combined entity became Citigroup.

Bigger Risks

As commercial banks sought to compete with investment banks, they took bigger trading risks and created off-balance- sheet financing vehicles to help reduce the capital they needed to hold to protect against loan losses. Investment banks became more aggressive in lending to companies and increased their own borrowing to buy securities or real estate.

Phil Gramm, a Republican senator from Texas who co-authored the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that repealed many key provisions of Glass-Steagall, later went to work for UBS AG, the Swiss bank whose foray into investment banking contributed to an 88 percent drop in its shares since June 2007. Robert Rubin, a Clinton administration Treasury secretary who advocated Glass-Steagall’s repeal, went on to work for Citigroup, which lost $27.7 billion in 2008 and has needed $45 billion in government funds to remain solvent.

“Taxpayers rightfully should ask that, if an institution has become so large that there is no alternative except for the taxpayers to provide support, should we allow so many institutions to exceed that kind of threshold,” FDIC’s Bair said March 8 on the CBS News program “60 Minutes.”

‘Unmanageable’ Conglomerates

The financial conglomerates enabled by the lifting of Glass-Steagall restrictions are “unmanageable,” Volcker said in January. Traditional commercial banking shouldn’t be combined with “very risky capital market activities,” he said.

Some argue that Glass-Steagall’s repeal is not to blame for the current financial crisis.

“There’s nothing any of these groups did that they couldn’t do before,” said Jim Leach, a former Republican congressman from Iowa who helped engineer the law’s undoing. Rather, the fault lies with “the greatest regulatory breakdown in history, on the part of the Fed, the Treasury and the Securities and Exchange Commission,” said Leach, now a professor at Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School.

Several officials who supported the 1933 law’s repeal have returned to positions of power in Washington in the current administration. Most prominent among them is Lawrence Summers, Obama’s top economic adviser, who succeeded Rubin as Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration. Timothy Geithner, who now serves as Treasury secretary, was undersecretary for international affairs under Rubin and Summers.

Advocates of reinstalling barriers between investment and commercial banking “will run into a little bit of opposition from the same people who fought so hard for the death of Glass- Steagall,” Alan “Ace” Greenberg, the former Bear Stearns Cos. chief executive officer said on Bloomberg Television March 9.

To contact the reporter on this story: Matthew Benjamin in Washington at Mbenjamin2@bloomberg.net; Christine Harper in New York at charper@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 10, 2009 05:54 EDT



To: Rock_nj who wrote (162658)3/10/2009 5:58:08 PM
From: Gersh Avery  Respond to of 361839
 
It's a "everyone" issue ..

Except for those who never have and never will be sick.

It's kind of funny how peoples minds change when they can't keep food down.