SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bearcatbob who wrote (5920)3/10/2009 6:05:03 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
Irrespective of GW we don't need nukes to generate the energy necessary to run this country.. let alone the world. We are literally bathed in energy around us all the time in various forms.

We just need to tap into this free energy. Solar is only one of the many forms available to us.

Eric



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (5920)3/10/2009 6:06:16 PM
From: RetiredNow  Respond to of 86355
 
I thought you wanted the market to decide? Renewable energy seems to be taking market share faster than nukes, probably because of the upfront cost and regulatory issues associated with nukes.

BTW, very few people I talk to that believe in global warming are against nukes. That's a red herring issue that the GOP normally brings up to try to discredit GW believers. It's pretty silly. I'd say the majority of Americans of both parties are all of the abovers.



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (5920)3/10/2009 8:23:31 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 86355
 
Nuclear power is truth time for GW alarmists.

Yep, and they're pretty much all agin it.