Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (5964)	3/11/2009 10:17:19 AM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

I agree except for one... big... problem. Environmental pollution.. I'm tired of breathing the crap that comes out the stack.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (5964)	3/11/2009 10:34:33 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

Only an environmental (AGW) rationale. If thats your rationale for being anti-coal and it obviously is, just be open and honest about it. And I was... there is risk that GW is actually happening because of CO2. I don't know if it is, but if it is the repercussions are huge. And it wouldn't be something we can turn around overnight... probably take a generation. All of which I said before. Does that make me a 'radicalized liberal'? Or maybe a 'conservative' who is being cautious?