SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (105959)3/11/2009 3:57:18 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541803
 
My own recent experiences leave me feeling that they've got better systems than ours, if only just for that reason.

I appreciate the extreme difficulty of your situation but cases like yours could be obviated without up-ending the whole system. It would be relatively simple to set up either a government program to cover them or force insurance companies to create an assigned risk program or some such. You don't disrupt the ninety some percent for the few. It makes no system sense.

They do not suffer from the stress of worrying about how to pay medical bills.

That's a plus. Your pet plus. And then there are the rest of the pluses and minuses...

Consider also that there are plenty of stories about people adversely affected by various aspects of our healthcare system, too.

Indeed. Much to be weighed.



To: Cogito who wrote (105959)3/11/2009 5:49:39 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 541803
 
Cogito
I think the worries about health care represent a real quality of life issue- and issue people in other developed countries simply do not face. I heartily agree with you that merely on that issue alone, universal health is worthwhile. I don't care what kind of system we have (though I'd prefer the most rational one)- but universal health is something I definitely would like to see.