Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JMAR Technologies(JMAR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (3655)	10/25/1997 4:15:00 PM
From: timwa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9695

Individual Investor (November) is now on the news stands. I had to pick up a copy just for memorabilia's sake. Will be fun to look back and see how the price was once under $4. Amateurs...Hmmmmm

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (3655)	10/25/1997 4:27:00 PM
From: Starlight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9695

Hi Dude - A lot of us here follow the CYMI board also, and in fact, the CYMI people wish we didn't. We've posted notes over there about competition (much to their dismay), and they refuse to believe it. I'm glad to know that a Barron's article also points this out. The CYMI people like to keep their head in the sand. Betty P.S. Dave - I saw that article, too. CNBC had it wrong at first, and they corrected themselves later. By the way, the increased use of Flash Mem. ought to help another little company we both own.

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (3655)	10/26/1997 9:33:00 AM
From: Ken W	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9695

If the story you are referring to is Fleckenstein's (sp) article about his short position in CYMI in Barrons. There has been some discussion of his opinions in the CYMI thread. As it is pointed out, the interview with this guys came before the release of earnings and the subsequent conference call which frankly paints a quite different picture. As an investor in both CYMI and JMAR, I would be interested in hearing both sides of the story... Thanks for the great information contained in this thread Ken