SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cactus Jack who wrote (163067)3/13/2009 12:17:15 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361478
 
Grantham Urges Shift to Stocks Before ‘Rigor Mortis’

By Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam

March 10 (Bloomberg) -- Jeremy Grantham, who oversees $85 billion as chief investment strategist of Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Co., urged investors to start moving money from cash to stocks before “rigor mortis” sets in.

“Typically, those with a lot of cash will miss a very large chunk of the market recovery” because they are paralyzed by fear, Grantham wrote in a March 4 commentary posted today on the Boston-based firm’s Web site.

Grantham, who last year reversed his decade-long bearish stance on stocks, maintained his view from January that the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index may fall below 600 before rebounding. The benchmark U.S. index dropped yesterday to 676.53, the lowest since September 1996, before gaining 6.4 percent to 719.60 today in New York. Based on his estimate of fair value, the S&P 500 should be valued at 900.

“Remember that you will never catch the low,” wrote Grantham, one of the co-founders of GMO. He expects stocks to return 10 percent to 13 percent after inflation in the next seven years.

The S&P 500 Index has declined 20 percent this year as the global economy worsened, raising concern that corporate earnings would be slashed and major U.S. banks would need to be nationalized. Today, stocks rallied after Citigroup Inc. said it is having its best quarter since 2007.

Grantham told investors to make the shift from cash to stocks in a “few large steps” instead of all at once. GMO started reinvesting in stocks in October, and has a schedule for more moves based on future market declines, Grantham wrote.

Grantham, 70, nicknamed a “perma-bear” by colleagues because of his grim view on stocks for more than a decade, said in April 2007 that the world was in the middle of a “global bubble,” and by July that same year said he had never been more bearish.

In January 2008, Grantham advised a shift to cash.



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (163067)3/13/2009 11:29:28 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361478
 
Jeter’s U.S. Squad Is WBC Favorite After Dominican Team Ouster

By Erik Matuszewski

March 13 (Bloomberg) -- Team USA is the new favorite to win the World Baseball Classic after the first-round elimination of the Dominican Republic, the oddsmakers top choice prior to the tournament.

The U.S. team, stocked with Major League Baseball All-Stars including Derek Jeter, David Wright, Jimmy Rollins and Jake Peavy, is a 5-2 choice to win the championship, according to the Las Vegas Hilton Race & Sports Book.

Team USA, which failed to get past the second round at the inaugural World Baseball Classic three years ago, is favored over defending champion Japan and 2006 runner-up Cuba. The Dominican Republic was the oddsmakers’ pick entering the second edition of the event, then was eliminated after losing twice to the Netherlands, where the sport is called Honkbal.

“There are a lot of competitive teams at the top, but the U.S. is the deepest now that the Dominicans are gone,” Jeff Sherman, assistant manager at the Hilton’s sports book, said in a telephone interview.

The Americans this year went 2-1 in the opening round and next play tomorrow in Miami, where they meet an undefeated Puerto Rico squad that features major-league players such as Carlos Beltran, Carlos Delgado and Ivan Rodriguez.

“We’ve put together a pretty good team, and we feel real comfortable with where we’re at,” Wright, a New York Mets player who is the U.S.’s third baseman, said, according to MLB.com. “But we can’t rest on what we’ve done and who we have on paper.”

Championship Odds

The U.S. team is a 6-5 choice to win the WBC title at Internet sports book BetUS.com. The Americans dropped from 7-4 at the start of the 16-team championship, which is organized by Major League Baseball and features pitch limits to protect players from injury before the start of the U.S. season.

Japan is the second choice to win the title at 2-1, followed by Cuba (5-1), South Korea (5-1), Puerto Rico (10-1), Venezuela (12-1) and Mexico (20-1).

The Netherlands, with only pitchers Sidney Ponson and Rick VandenHurk on major-league rosters last season, has odds of 60-1 after opening at 150-1, according to BetUS.com.

With a mix of younger players and former major-league veterans including Randall Simon and Gene Kingsale, the Dutch team beat the Dominican Republic 2-1 and 3-2. While the Dominican team was without Alex Rodriguez and Albert Pujols, its roster included major-league All-Stars Jose Reyes, David Ortiz, Miguel Tejada, Hanley Ramirez and Robinson Cano.

“Nobody could have foreseen the Netherlands being as competitive as they have with their two wins and making it to the next round,” Sherman said. “They’re still the longshot of the field, but they’ve done a lot better than anyone could have anticipated.”

Second-Round Groups

The U.S. is grouped in Miami with Puerto Rico, Venezuela and the Netherlands, while Japan, South Korea, Cuba and Mexico will play second-round games in San Diego.

The top two teams from each group advance to the semifinals on March 21-22 at Dodger Stadium, with the championship game scheduled for the next day in Los Angeles.

Peavy, who won the National League Cy Young Award in 2007 with the San Diego Padres, will probably pitch tomorrow. Javier Vazquez of the Atlanta Braves will likely start for Puerto Rico, which outscored its three first-round opponents 15-1.

After tomorrow, the U.S. will face either the Netherlands or Venezuela, which beat the Americans in the first round to win their group.

“When you play in a short tournament, every game is important,” Jeter, who was part of the U.S. team that went 3-3 in 2006, told reporters. “You have no luxury to take any games lightly.”

2006 Elimination

The Americans also went 2-1 in opening-round play in 2006. In the second round, they beat Japan before consecutive losses to South Korea and Mexico.

“The bottom line is, we didn’t play well enough to advance the last time around,” said Jeter, who returned to this year’s U.S. team along with Peavy, Atlanta Braves third baseman Chipper Jones and Los Angeles Angels reliever Scot Shields. “Hopefully this year we do.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Erik Matuszewski in New York at matuszewski@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: March 13, 2009 00:00 EDT



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (163067)3/13/2009 11:04:28 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361478
 
Madoff Family Had $826 Million Net Worth, Filing Says

By David Glovin and Christopher Scinta

March 13 (Bloomberg) -- The family of Bernard Madoff, who pleaded guilty yesterday to masterminding the largest Ponzi scheme in history, claimed a net worth of $826 million as of December 31, according to a court filing.

As part of a request to free Madoff from prison before he is sentenced in June, Madoff’s lawyers today filed court documents with the U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan. Included was Madoff’s financial statement, which he filed in a civil lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The document had been filed in that case confidentially.

“Net worth (assets minus liabilities) $823 to $826 million,” the document says. Of the $826 million in net worth, Madoff said that $700 million was the net value of his ownership in Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. The document says the Madoffs’ liabilities were $265,000.

Madoff’s brokerage, which is being sold to pay victims of his scheme, may fetch no more than $10 million, according to Larry Tabb, founder of TABB Group, a financial-market research and advisory firm. The brokerage, which is being marketed to potential bidders, had earnings of just $1.12 million last year, according to documents drawn up by investment bank Lazard Ltd.

Other than the value of Madoff’s business, the largest assets claimed by the Madoff family are $17 million in cash and $45 million in securities. Last week, U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton, who is presiding over the lawsuit against Madoff by the SEC, said the money manager’s lawyers claimed that his wife, Ruth, alone owns $17 million in cash and $45 million in municipal bonds. Ruth Madoff also claims ownership to a Manhattan apartment that the filing says is worth $7 million.

The attorneys said Ruth Madoff claimed those assets are “unrelated” to the alleged multibillion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by her husband, Stanton said.

Ponzi Scheme

The document was filed a day after Madoff, 70, pleaded guilty to defrauding investors of as much as $65 billion in the largest-ever Ponzi scheme. His attorneys filed a request with the appeals court that Madoff be freed from prison until he is sentenced on June 16. Madoff faces 150 years behind bars for using money from new investors to pay off old ones in a scheme that ran from at least the early 1990s.

“I operated a Ponzi scheme through the investment advisory side of my business,” Madoff told U.S. District Judge Denny Chin at yesterday’s hearing in a courtroom packed with victims and members of the media. Speaking publicly for the first time since his arrest on Dec. 11, he said he was “deeply sorry” and knew what he did was criminal.

Dan Horwitz, a lawyer for Madoff, didn’t immediately return a call.

Cash, Securities

Madoff and his wife had $17.03 million in cash, the document says. Between $4 million and $7 million was owed to Ruth Madoff from their sons, the document says. The Madoffs had $45 million in securities, in addition to Madoff’s interest in his market-making and money-management businesses, valued at $700 million, the document says.

The couple valued their East 64th Street apartment in Manhattan at $7 million, their house in Montauk at $3 million, their home in Palm Beach, Florida, at $11 million, and their residence in Cap d’Antibe, France, at $1 million. The furnishings for the homes are worth $9.9 million, according to court papers.

The Madoffs also had $2.6 million in jewelry and a 50 percent share in an airplane valued at $12 million, according to the court document.

Four Boats

The family has four boats, according to the filing. Ruth Madoff owns a 2006 Leopard yacht named “Bull” in France, which is worth $7 million; a vessel named “Sitting Bull” in Montauk, worth $320,000; and a boat named “Little Bull” in Florida, worth $25,000. The Madoffs also own a Rybovich fishing boat moored in Palm Beach valued at $2.2 million.

The Madoffs put their total liabilities at $265,000, including $100,000 in credit card debt, $151,000 in accrued real estate taxes, and $10,000 owed on a car lease.

The Madoff’s expenses totaled $346,758 a month, largely for maintaining and insuring their homes and boats, the document says. Their expenses also include $100,000 in monthly legal fees and $140,000 for personal security each month, according to the court filing.

Peter Chavkin, a lawyer for Ruth Madoff, and Mauro Wolfe, a lawyer for Bernard Madoff, declined to comment.

It’s unclear if investigators will pursue the Madoff family assets. Kevin McCue, a spokesman for Irving Picard, the trustee liquidating Madoff Securities, didn’t immediately respond to a phone call or e-mail seeking comment. Prosecutors have said that as much as $170 billion that flowed through Madoff Securities since the start of the fraud may be subject to seizure.

The case is U.S. v. Madoff, 09-cr-00213, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: David Glovin in New York federal court at dglovin@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 13, 2009 18:30 EDT



To: Cactus Jack who wrote (163067)3/16/2009 8:29:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361478
 
‘Medieval’ U.S. Law Firm Pay Structure Buckles (Update1)

By Carlyn Kolker

March 16 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. law firms, including Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Shearman & Sterling LLP and WolfBlock LLP, are abandoning tradition as they cut costs in the deepening recession by imposing merit pay, slashing salaries and generally putting an end to decades of associate entitlement.

The firms are responding to the plunge in corporate, real estate and finance work by overhauling compensation for associates, who often total as many as two-thirds of a firm’s lawyers. Some, like Orrick, are beginning to reward lawyers based on performance rather than seniority. Others plan to cut salaries for starting associates, just two years after top firms raised pay to compete for talent.

“In the current economic crisis, we see the final demise of the medieval guild in the American legal profession,” said Joel Henning, a law firm consultant at Hildebrandt International Inc.

Law firms have operated for decades with associate pay structures that don’t reward performance, Henning said. The industry’s retooling comes as dozens of firms including DLA Piper, the world’s second-largest law firm with 3,700 lawyers; Latham & Watkins LLP; White & Case LLP; Holland & Knight LLP and Orrick, have collectively terminated thousands of attorneys.

“One of the best things firms are doing is breaking the ridiculous lockstep structure of associate compensation,” Henning said. “There is no other profession that operates that way.”

1,100-Lawyer Firm

Orrick is a 1,100-attorney firm based in San Francisco whose clients include Wells Fargo & Co., the third biggest U.S. bank by deposits, and PG&E Corp., California’s largest utility owner. The firm said it plans to discard guaranteed raises to associates in July. It has fired lawyers twice in the past year, including 100 this month and 40 in November.

Associate pay increases will be based on merit, not just on seniority as has been done throughout the legal industry, Orrick Chief Executive Officer Ralph Baxter said in an interview.

The firm originally intended to introduce the change next year. It decided to switch in July because of the deterioration of the economy, Baxter said.

Orrick will also introduce new tiers of associates, or salaried lawyers, replacing the traditional single-track system where some become partners who share in the firm’s profits after about eight years, Baxter said. Under the new structure, associates will be able to stay at the firm permanently, drawing salaries, he said.

Law Firm Reforms

Orrick’s reforms will let lawyers know if they’re likely to make partner and allow those unwilling to work the long hours required for that position to stay at the firm, Baxter said.

Clients typically pay much less for work done by a law firm associate than that performed by a partner.

“We will be perceived as a law firm that is adapting to the marketplace,” Baxter said.

Washington-based law firm Howrey introduced a similar plan in January, and McGuireWoods LLP started one two years ago.

Associates are evaluated based on how many hours they bill, feedback from partners and client satisfaction, McGuireWoods Managing Partner Thomas Cabaniss said in an interview.

New York-based Shearman & Sterling also will base associate bonuses on merit, rather than grant them in lockstep fashion, partner Matthew Bersani said in February.

When Howrey announced it was switching compensation systems in 2007, the firm was seen as “committing suicide” because it wouldn’t be able to compete for personnel, said law firm consultant Peter Zeughauser, chairman of Newport Beach, California-based Zeughauser Group.

‘Substantial Number’

Now, Zeughauser said, “a very substantial number of firms are considering something like this.”

Howrey spent more than a year seeking advice from consultants and input from associates before finally implementing the new merit-based compensation program, firm spokeswoman Christine Till said in an interview.

The current standard for starting pay at the top firms, about $160,000, was set in January 2007 when New York-based firms including Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP raised pay 10 percent from $145,000. Other firms across the country followed suit. Salaries for most senior associates at the biggest firms seldom rise past $400,000, Henning said.

Associate salaries at some firms are less than 10 percent of partners’ shares of the profits. Per-partner profit at New York’s Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP was $2.5 million last year. It was $2.14 million at Philadelphia-based Dechert LLP, according to the American Lawyer, a trade magazine.

Richmond, Virginia-based McGuireWoods this month cut starting salaries by 10 percent, from $160,000 to $144,000, and froze pay for existing associates.

10 Percent Cut

Philadelphia-based WolfBlock cut pay at all associate levels by 10 percent in February to preserve five to 10 jobs, Chairman Mark Alderman said. The 300-attorney firm eliminated some positions, he said, declining to say how many.

Some New York-based and so-called national firms are also considering cutting first-year pay, according to two heads of large firms who declined to be named because the discussions aren’t public.

“It’s unprecedented to have a rollback,” said Zeughauser.

Other firms have introduced less drastic measures to keep down associate costs.

Leave the Firm

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, the San Francisco- based firm whose clients include Chevron Corp., the second- biggest U.S. energy company, and Bank of America Corp., the biggest U.S. bank, announced this month it would pay associates a year’s salary if they left the firm and worked for a year at an approved charity or legal-services organization. The firm has fired 55 associates this year. The salary would be what the organization would pay them as an employee, the firm said.

“At Pillsbury, we start with the following premise,” said firm Chairman James Rishwain. “We are in a new economy, and no assumption is safe.”

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, the New York- based law firm, will pay associates one-third of their salaries to work at public interest organizations for a year, the firm announced this month.

The firm is also making the offer to associates who were slated to begin working at the firm later this year, firm executive partner Robert Sheehan said in a March 12 memo.

The reduction in law firm compensation brought on by the recession may reverse years of excessive pay for attorneys, said Henning, the law firm consultant.

“This is an opportunity to do things that should have been done a long time ago,” he said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Carlyn Kolker in New York at ckolker@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 16, 2009 13:22 EDT