SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (163181)3/14/2009 3:29:14 AM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361355
 
Patients Putting Off or Rushing Surgery
By KEVIN SACK

As the recession deepens, doctors and hospitals are reporting that hard-pressed patients are deferring elective surgery, like knee replacements and nose jobs, even as others are speeding up non-urgent procedures out of fear that they may soon lose their jobs and health insurance.

With unemployment still rising, there are wide variations by region and type of surgery. That means that highly regarded orthopedic surgeons in Chicago may be as busy as ever, while gastroenterologists in Atlanta are scrambling to fill cancellations.

But even those whose operating rooms are booked months in advance say they anticipate a slowdown later this year... (Wharfy quit the hospital to play war games.)...

Delaying elective procedures can have serious medical consequences, as when a detectable polyp develops into a tumor because a patient skips a colonoscopy. Some hospitals said their emergency rooms were already seeing patients with dire conditions that could have been avoided had they not deferred surgery for economic reasons.

“We’re probably seeing five or six of those a day at each of our hospitals,” said Zeff Ross, a senior vice president at Memorial Healthcare System, which operates six hospitals in South Florida. “Someone gets an attack of diverticulitis, but they wait. They get it a second time and the doctor tells them to get the surgery done now, but they still wait. The third time, it perforates and that’s a much tougher surgery, much more dangerous for the patient and with a longer length of stay...where Wharfy molests you maybe when you're sleeping...”

The slowdown is likely to have significant financial repercussions. Elective operations are typically covered by private insurance plans that tend to reimburse hospitals and doctors at higher rates than government insurance programs like Medicare and Medicaid. As those payments dwindle, so do hospital profit margins and the resources to provide charity care to a growing number of uninsured.
...And so hospitals help you die sooner...

“Elective admissions could represent only 9 or 10 percent of a hospital’s admissions and yet represent 25 percent of its bottom line,” said Michael A. Sachs, chief executive of Sg2, a health care consulting firm. “They’re the patients that subsidize the underfunding associated with Medicaid and Medicare patients and uncompensated care.”

The loss of revenue and growth in uncompensated care is conspiring with other byproducts of the recession — declining philanthropy, battered investments and tight credit — to force many hospitals to lay off workers, postpone expansions and cancel equipment purchases.

A study released in November by the American Hospital Association found that about one-third of hospitals had seen either a moderate or significant decrease in elective procedures in the previous three months. More recent studies in states like New Jersey and Georgia have put the figure closer to 50 percent. Ambulatory surgical centers, which had experienced exponential growth over the last decade, are also reporting a slowdown in some markets.

Dr. David S. George, an Ohio ophthalmologist who with two other physicians owns an outpatient eye center, said they performed 5 percent fewer cataract operations in 2008 than in 2007, following nearly a decade of consistent 10 percent annual growth.

“That was the first down year we’ve had,” Dr. George said. “When we tell patients about the benefits of cataract surgery, we’re getting more answers like, ‘Well, it’s not that bad yet. Let’s check it out in six months or a year.’ Even those with good insurance are very concerned about the co-pay and the out-of-pocket costs.”

That is the case for Jane Bagwell, a 60-year-old legal secretary in Atlanta, who has chosen to delay surgery to repair a torn rotator cuff in her left shoulder, even though she rates her pain as an 8 on a scale of 1 to 10.

In a less terrifying economy, Ms. Bagwell said, she would not hesitate to schedule the operation. These days, however, she finds herself pinching every penny, including the ones that would help her pay the 20 percent share of surgical costs not covered by insurance. And given that her law firm is laying off staff members, she worries that if she took three weeks off to recuperate, her job might be eliminated before she could return.

Instead, she pops ibuprofen. “I feel like I live off them,” she said.

The trends are far from universal, with some physicians and hospitals saying they have seen little change. Several doctors interviewed reported that some of their patients were deferring procedures while others were accelerating them.

“They’re trying to get things done next week because they know they’re going to be losing their insurance or going to Cobra,” said Dr. Jeffrie L. Kamean, an Atlanta gastroenterologist.

Dr. Kamean was referring to the federal law that allows laid-off workers to continue their employer-sponsored insurance, though at costs that are often prohibitive (the federal stimulus package provides money to subsidize Cobra expenses).

Val Arnold, 37, a skin cancer survivor who lives in Holly, Mich., said she chose to have reconstructive surgery on her nose on Feb. 13 because she had been laid off from her job with General Motors and would lose her employer-sponsored insurance on March 1. She would have preferred to wait, so that she would be immediately available if the automaker reactivated her job.

“It was like all of a sudden I have to get it done now,” Ms. Arnold said during her two-week recuperation. “What if they call me this week?”

Health experts predict that as the economy worsens, more insured people will begin deferring care because they cannot afford the high deductibles common in the insurance market.

“During good economic times, the trade-offs aren’t as severe,” said David Dranove, a professor of health-industry management at Northwestern University. “It’s that $2,000 for elective surgery versus that vacation in Cancún. Now it’s $2,000 for the surgery versus making the mortgage payments, and suddenly the surgery can wait.”

At Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak, Mich., outpatient surgical volumes are down 10 percent so far this year compared with 2008. At Elkhart General Hospital in Elkhart, Ind., site of a Caterpillar plant that has seen huge layoffs, the 498 operations in January were 28 fewer than in January 2008 and 63 fewer than projected in this year’s budget, said Gregory W. Lintjer, the president.

“We’re seeing a slowdown in hip and knee replacements, the kind of things that people can live with a little longer if they so choose,” Mr. Lintjer said.

Not surprisingly, the steepest drop has been in plastic surgery, which is typically not covered by insurance. Dr. John W. Canady, the president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, said business seemed to be off by an average of 30 percent among his members, particularly for surgical procedures.

On the other hand, Dr. Canady said, plastic surgeons are starting to field requests for Botox and other minor aesthetic improvements from middle-aged patients who find themselves competing for jobs against younger applicants.

nytimes.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (163181)3/14/2009 5:27:02 AM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 361355
 
The Pursuit and Pleasures of the Pure Spirit (Ukiah)
By STEVE MCCARTHY

Making eau de vie is not for the faint of heart. Nor is drinking it. In America, most spirits are consumed as part of a cocktail, and most cocktails are designed to hide the less-than-elegant character of the cheaper spirits commonly used in mixed drinks. My distillations, bottled at 80 proof, and bone dry and containing only the spirit of the fruit, are often shocking to people who have been drinking spirits for decades but have never actually tasted what they are drinking.

To make matters even more perilous, my distillations are expensive. It takes about 30 pounds of pears to make one 750 milliliter bottle of eau de vie of poire. So my suggested retail price of $39.95 per bottle (of which I keep less than half after taxes and discounts for distribution) leaves me precious little room to cover costs and maybe make a bit of profit. At the same time even my best customers can be discouraged by what they see as a fairly expensive bottle.

If you are drinking an artisan distillation, you are drinking the history of a people, of a region, and of what they grow.
But there is an issue beyond — and probably more intractable than — price. Our busy lives (and the need for restaurants to turn tables) make life tough for an eau de vie. Historically these spirits were taken at the dinner table as a digestive at the end of a long, leisurely meal. Think back: How many of those have you had recently? Maybe one a month, if you’re lucky.

But that’s why I love eau de vie. I like to have it — maybe an ounce or an ounce and a half — at the table, surrounded by good friends (as few as one will do nicely) after a wonderful meal that was accompanied by a glass or two of good wine. The conversation that takes place at those times, the experience of talking about family legends and political figures, are in fact part of eau de vie.

I have always felt that if you are drinking an artisan distillation, you are drinking the history of a people, of a region, and of what they grow. Every product I have developed — about 23 over the last 25 years — has had a specific European ancestor. In 1961, when I was a student in France, I joined the Grenoble Université Montagne, the mountain climbing club, and climbed in the Alps that spring. Some fairly mediocre eau de vie helped me to go to sleep at night in crowded huts in the Alps. (I remember the good eau de vie as well as the bad.) I know the best Kirschwasser I ever had, a bottle of 10-year-old Swiss Kirsch from Dettling Distillery. The best eau de vie of pear by Ova Distillers of Switzerland. Barrel aged apple brandy — an obscure Calvados.

A product that all conceivable market research would say had absolutely no future is now a modest success, which is pretty good for something made out of a fir tree.
I have respected these products and the people who made them. These were not developed in some factory laboratory somewhere, but 200 years ago in the barns of peasants who were trying to find a way to use the pears that the pigs would no longer eat. And by and large I have not departed from European traditions in my efforts to duplicate what the French and the Germans and the Swiss and the Italians developed. Those people know a lot. Now, maybe, I am taking small liberties in fermentation and distillation. But only because, I think, I have earned the right to do so. And only because the results are better than my earlier efforts, and maybe, sometimes, better than what the Europeans make. I see all of this too, I think, in a few other small distillers of eau de vie who have a long track record of steadily improving offerings, and who now feel free — correctly — to nudge their products away from their ancestry. Try the Aqua Perfecta eau de vie from St. George distillery, for example. Totally accomplished and in character but also clearly American. Or the magical alembic distillations of Germain-Robin, from Ukiah, Calif.

Twenty years ago in Colmar, France, I bought a bottle of eau de vie de bourgeons de sapin d’Alsace, made from the buds of the spruce tree and one of the more obscure eau de vie in the world. I started to work on an Oregon version of the same product, using the Douglas Fir, the iconic conifer of the Pacific Northwest.

Each year, we took barrels of high proof Oregon wine distillates to our forest on the north side of Mount Hood in Oregon. We walked out into the woods and picked hundreds of pounds of the bright green buds and dropped them directly into stainless steel buckets full of that high proof wine distillate. We took the strange brew back to Portland, let the needles soak and then distilled the stew of fir buds and needles in our pot stills. I struggled with getting the intense spring conifer aroma of the Douglas Fir, the citrus flavor, and the emerald green/chartreuse color of the buds to reveal themselves in the same batch. We’d get the color we wanted, but not the aroma; or we’d get the color, but at raw distilled proof (160 proof) a strength that made it undrinkable. And when we brought the proof down, we would lose the color.

This went on for 15 years, and I suspected that my wonderful employees were saying things about me that I really did not want to hear. Then, a couple of years ago, with the help of a new employee, Daniel Ruiz, we finally got flavor, color and aroma to come together at 95.46 proof. We have a beautiful light green, ridiculously aromatic, robust eau de vie of Douglas Fir. A product that all conceivable market research would say had absolutely no future is now a modest success in the market place, which is pretty good for something made out of a fir tree.

In the last 25 years, we have learned that there is a market for our eau de vie in North America. These people want the pure taste of an eau de vie. They don’t mind that it is strong. That is what they want. And they don’t mind that it is not sweet. That’s what they want, too. And so, for us, that’s where the glory is: capturing the pure aroma and complex flavor of the Douglas Fir, the Mirabelle plum or the Loganberry, the apple and, of course, the pear.

The next impossible challenge? The insanely tart Oregon cranberry. Let’s hope it doesn’t take another 15 years.

proof.blogs.nytimes.com