SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (6378)3/14/2009 12:32:50 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
But the realty is that without that patient flow into ERs, you're going to have ERs closing down all over the place.

Not if the hospital owns both the ER and the clinic. It's the same patients getting the same services, just two different doors and, in some cases, two different price tags. Yes, their income could drop but maybe not if you staff the clinic with lower cost staff, which you could. And the coherence of the ER would improve as would its performance. There's a lot of waste in crowded waiting rooms and long queues.



To: i-node who wrote (6378)3/14/2009 1:45:43 PM
From: gg cox1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
A great word leader speaks on American health care.
Of course his remarks on Canadian, French, Swiss, German systems are not included nor his comments that America is paying 5 percent more of GDP for health care, and rising...making America less competitive world wide.

cnn.com