SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (106172)3/14/2009 10:35:20 PM
From: Cogito  Respond to of 541992
 
>>Allen - Could you tell me a few prominent Republicans who've been on the board, or in charge of any of the failed financial institutions that received bailout funds?<<

Michael -

No, I couldn't, nor do I feel obligated to. You are the one who is making the assertion that they are predominantly Democrats, so I'd say it's up to you to come up with the facts to back up your assertion.

Is it your contention that no prominent Republicans were CEOs or were on the boards of any of those institutions? Do you also believe that the Democrats on those boards are all a bunch of liberals? If so, on what do you base that belief? If you don't know the party affiliations of all of the board members, CEOs and other top managers of those companies, why do you make these assertions?

I do know that people who make more than 75k per year are more likely to be Republicans than Democrats, if that helps you at all. But to get up to CEO salary ranges, we'd have to get a lot more granular than that at the high end.

people-press.org

- Allen



To: greenspirit who wrote (106172)3/14/2009 11:27:43 PM
From: NAG1  Respond to of 541992
 
Michael,

From this article

slate.com

it does appear that fannie was a bipartisan effort.

Neal

Edit-Although not a financial institution when it existed, wasn't Wendy Gramm, Phil Gramm's wife, on the board at Enron before it went under