SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34129)3/16/2009 2:21:13 PM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
I happen to agree with Horowitz....

The time for this argument has passed....a substantial number of Courts have reviewed the issue and failed to act.

I think at this point.....if the effort was successful it would just create too much chaos to justify the victory. Time to let it go.

J.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34129)3/16/2009 2:22:14 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
You must be including the ENTIRE U.S. Supreme Court in that characterization (' fringe of conservatism that don't want the law enforced') now, right?



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (34129)3/16/2009 8:18:37 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
They are either afraid to deal with the truth or afraid of the consequences of the truth.

There you go again, attacking the man instead of the argument.

It's all ad hominem, all the time with you. That's not a convincing way to make an argument...

SD