SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)3/16/2009 5:44:49 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Cisco launches bid to capture the data center

blogs.zdnet.com

March 16th, 2009

Posted by Tom Steinert-Threlkeld @ 8:18 am

Cisco Systems has just launched what it considers a “critical step” in its Data Center 3.0 strategy, promising an ecosystem of partners which include chipmaker Intel, tech consultancy Accenture, virtualization software provider VMWare, Microsoft, the labs unit of enterprise software firm SAP, storage maker EMC and roughly two dozen other companies.

“The best technology doesn’t always win.” said Cisco CEO John Chambers. “I’ve always been technology-agostic,” contending this group would work on services that extended from the data center not just to the office, but the home as well.

The Unified Computing System is Cisco’s bid to take IBM and HP head-on in gaining entry and control of corporate data centers, through the use of virtualization and other technologies that consolidate the use of thousands of servers, applications and other resources. Right now, Cisco is a much smaller company in terms of revenue and has built most of its business on supplying network gear that connects data centers together (See chart).

But it now wants to be the behind-the-scenes coordinator of cloud computing, allowing “any application, at any time” to be delivered anywhere, said Rob Lloyd, executive vice president designate, Worldwide Operations for Cisco.

Chambers said that Cisco doesn’t enter markets that it doesn’t believe it can create some kind of “differentiation” that will lead to long-term leadership. He said the UCS “platform” would give Cisco and its partners access to roughly 25 percent of data center spending that could not be reached before. He called it a “multibillion dollar opportunity.”

The “unification” includes:

• Cisco UCS B-Series blade servers based on the future Intel Nehalem processors and intended to allow “signficantly more virtual machines per server.”

• 10-gigabit-per-second Ethernet connections, through local area networks, storage area networks and high performance computing networks. This is designed to reduce the amount of network adapters, switches, cables and pieces of cooling gear.

• Virtualization services, backed by Cisco security, policy enforcement and diagnostics.

• Storage access that ties together both storage area networks and network attached storage, using high-speed fibre channels and other connections.

• Management through both a graphical and command line interface in a product called Cisco Unified Computing System manager. This is designed to let IT staff manage all data center resource and automate provisioning of new services.

• Planning, design and implementation services, to conduct pilots or execute new services.

The initiative of course is also designed to sell Cisco hardware, as well. The company, as part of its attempt to unify data center operations, wants to be the glue that connects companies’ investments in existing gear from other suppliers.

As part of that, Cisco rolled out three new pieces of its Cisco Nexus family of switches, including the Nexus 7018 modular siwtch that can support up to 512 10 gigabit Ethernet ports, the Nexus 5010, with 28 ports; and the Nexus 2000 “fabric extender,” which is designed to increase the overall number of servers in a data center and the amount of bandwidth each can handle. Its Cisco Catalyst 6500 switch was recast as a “virtualized service node,” to help accelerate applications.

“This is perhaps the only evolutionary road,” that is feasible right now, said Paul Maritz, the chief executive of VMWare, that could lead to “revolutionary” new forms of computing.

For software developers, “our oxygen is really great hardware,” he said. For storage maker EMC, the announcement was cast as “game-changing” in its ability to lower cost, increase data center scale and reduce complexity, by chairman Joe Tucci. The result should be greater “speed and efficiency.”

The key here may be what BMC Software chief executive Bob Beachamp said would be the IT manager’s ability to see, use and assign all resources in a data center from “a single pane of glass,” i.e., single computer screen.

This is made possible, in theory, by virtualization, which provides a logical view of resources, rather than a physical view. In effect, a data center manager can see and regard all servers as a single pool of resources, with similar views on operating systems that are available, bandwidth that is available and able to be assigned and even applications, wherever they reside in reality.

Cisco, in its basic announcement, Cisco estimates its unification effort can cut capital spending on new hardware and software by 20 percent, reduce operating expenses in the data center by 30%, allow applications to be provisioned in minutes ‘instead of days,’ improve energy-efficiency and increase scale of operations without adding complexity.

In a corporate blog posting, Cisco specifically though tried to downplay the idea that it was “coming after IBM, HP or Dell.”

It said:

We are not advocating going and doing a forklift upgrade or rip/replace on existing data centers customers have.

Instead, Cisco is trying to create a “subcategory of the server market” that will allow computing in a customer’s own cloud to be unified.

The effort could stimulate spending in a flat market. IT spending in the U.S. is expected to be essentially unchanged this year from last.

“The money we unlock will be in the cracks between the siloes” of computing that exist in many corporations’ technology networks, Lloyd said.

-Tom Steinert-Threlkeld is a journalist who has constantly looked at what media could become, rather than what they currently constitute. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)3/16/2009 8:53:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Cisco Introduces Server Computers for Data Centers (Update4)

By Rochelle Garner

March 16 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc., the largest maker of networking equipment, introduced its first server system in a bid to get more revenue from corporate data centers by combining storage access, networking and computing.

The Unified Computing System marks Cisco’s entry into the market led by International Business Machines Corp. and Hewlett- Packard Co. Cisco unveiled the products today at an event in San Jose, California.

Chief Executive Officer John Chambers is seeking a bigger chunk of data-center revenue by moving beyond networking gear and into the computers that dish out the information. That lets customers use one supplier for more of their equipment. The so- called blade platform allows businesses to add more kinds of applications and manage many more servers with fewer people than they could before, Cisco said.

“The way you get high-performance data centers is through very tight integration between storage, computer and network,” Sam Wilson, an analyst at JMP Securities LLC in San Francisco, said in an interview. “Cisco is entering a world where it historically hasn’t played.”

The server-computer market was valued at $13.5 billion in the fourth quarter by researcher IDC in Framingham, Massachusetts. Dell Inc. and Sun Microsystems Inc. are the third-and fourth-largest manufacturers, after IBM and Hewlett- Packard.

Chambers told the event the new platform marks a milestone for the computer industry.

“This is disruptive,” Chambers said. “We have very little interest in the product space. We are more interested in how it comes together.”

Partners

Blade servers, thin computers that resemble pizza boxes, slide into slots in a chassis, packing power in a small space.

The new system will cut operating expenses by at least 30 percent and capital spending by at least 20 percent, Chambers said.

“We never enter a market from the standpoint of just a box,” he said. “We enter it with the idea of an architecture.”

Using virtualization software from VMWare Inc. and systems- management programs from BMC Software Inc., customers can treat many devices as a single machine, moving applications to underused servers or backing up information across the network. They may also install applications to servers anywhere in the data center. Partners include EMC Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp.

“It will be shipped as a system, configured as a system, and we expect customers to turn it on and enable it,” said Rob Lloyd, executive vice president-designate of Cisco’s worldwide operations. The blade architecture will let thousands of virtual machines be incorporated into one “manageable system,” he said.

‘Potential Distraction’

Cisco, based in San Jose, fell 6 cents to $15.45 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading. The shares have lost 5.2 percent this year.

The company’s move into corporate data centers contrasts with the strategy of rival Juniper Networks Inc., the second- biggest maker of network equipment. Juniper remains focused purely on networking gear, said Mike Banic, vice president of the enterprise platform business.

“We see this as a potential distraction to their core business of switching and routing,” Banic said of Cisco.

Cisco’s server features make it well-suited for corporate customers and service providers that want to deliver software and services over the Web, often referred to as cloud computing, said BMC CEO Bob Beauchamp.

‘Game Changer’

“It’s a game changer,” Beauchamp said today on Bloomberg Television. “Cisco is entering in a big way and doing it with new, innovative ways that no other competitor in the world has.”

Cloud computing lets users access programs and processing power without having to maintain their own servers. The term originates from network diagrams, where the Internet is represented as a cloud.

“It will become the de facto standard for cloud computing, where customers can request their own servers and, with a point and click, install the software they want on the server they want,” Beauchamp said in an interview.

To contact the reporter on this story: Rochelle Garner in San Francisco at rgarner4@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: March 16, 2009 16:13 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)3/18/2009 4:36:56 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Sun Micro Shares Surge in Germany on IBM Acquisition Report

By Robert Valpuesta

March 18 (Bloomberg) -- Sun Microsystems Inc. surged in German trading after the Wall Street Journal reported International Business Machines Corp. is in talks to buy the company for at least $6.5 billion.

Sun Microsystems jumped as much as 61 percent to 6 euros at 9:12 a.m. in Frankfurt. The offer would value Sun’s stock at more than double the closing price of $4.97 in the U.S. yesterday, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the plan. An agreement may not be reached, the newspaper said.

An acquisition of Sun Microsystems would bolster IBM’s Internet, data storage, government and telecommunications business, the newspaper said, citing the people.

In recent months, Sun Microsystems has contacted a number of technology companies with the aim of being acquired, people familiar with the matter said, according to the newspaper. Hewlett-Packard Co. declined the offer, the newspaper reported, citing a person briefed on the matter.

Arlene Wainstein, a spokeswoman for IBM in Paris, said it’s company policy not to comment on reports. Shabita Wu, a spokeswoman at Sun in Taipei, declined to comment on the report.

To contact the reporter on this story: Robert Valpuesta in London at rvalpuesta@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 18, 2009 04:21 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)3/19/2009 6:07:31 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
I.B.M., Looking to Buy Sun, Sets Up a Software Strategy

dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com

March 19, 2009

I.B.M.’s interest in acquiring the server computer maker Sun Microsystems for nearly $7 billion may seem at first to be a reversal of its recent efforts to move away from the hardware business.

But analysts say there is more to Sun than servers, which are used in corporate data centers. They say its strengths in software, systems design and research make it an attractive target, The New York Times’s Steve Lohr and Ashlee Vance write.

The price tag being discussed by the companies works out to nearly $10 a share, The Times said, citing a person with knowledge of the negotiations. That is approximately twice Sun’s closing price on Tuesday. Shares of Sun surged nearly 79 percent Wednesday on news of the negotiations, to close at $8.89.

I.B.M. has pared back its dependence on hardware, where profit gains have declined, while increasing its investment in higher-margin software and services businesses. It sold off its personal computer business to Lenovo of China in 2005, and its hard-disk drive unit to Hitachi of Japan in 2003.

Sun has a solid share of the market for server computers used in corporate data centers, but it too has been trying to expand in more profitable businesses. While it is struggling financially today, the Silicon Valley company has long been a source of technological innovation.

Sun created both the Solaris operating system, a version of Unix, and Java, an Internet-era programming language and related software tools. Java is the teaching language in most of computer science, and software programs written in Java are widely used in things like data centers and cellphones.

“The technologies of greatest interest to I.B.M. are Java and Solaris, and those are notably not hardware technologies,” David M. Smith, an analyst at Gartner, told The Times.

I.B.M. uses Java extensively in its big software group, which trails only Microsoft in size. It has its own Java-based tools for software developers, called Eclipse, and at times it has clashed with Sun, potentially weakening the Java camp as an alternative to Microsoft’s Windows software and tools.

If it acquired Sun, I.B.M. “would unify those warring groups and make for a stronger front against Microsoft,” Michael A. Cusumano, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management, told The Times.

Both I.B.M. and Sun boast sizable communities of third-party software developers who write programs using their technology. An estimated one million programmers use Sun’s technology, while I.B.M.’s vast software business claims eight million.

Both companies not only support Java, but are also backers of the open-source operating system Linux, a rival to Microsoft’s Windows in data centers and on some desktop personal computers. In 2008, Sun increased its commitment to open-source software by paying about $1 billion for MySQL, a company distributing an open-source database that is used in Web commerce sites.

Still, Sun’s server business means that the merger, if completed, would be a major consolidation in the machines that power corporate data centers — and it would certainly invite antitrust scrutiny.

News of the talks between the two companies was first reported in The Wall Street Journal. I.B.M. would not comment, The Times said. Sun’s chairman, Scott McNealy, told The Times in an e-mail message: “As always, I don’t comment on rumors, no matter how accurate or silly they may be.”

Despite its innovations in software, Sun has been unable to arrest the erosion in the profitability of its mainstay server business. That business had long been based on Sun’s proprietary hardware designs, and its high-end machines still are.

The profits in proprietary servers have been under steady pressure from machines run by lower-cost microprocessors, made by Intel and Advanced Micro Devices, using personal computer technology. The leading makers of these industry-standard servers are Hewlett-Packard and Dell.

The price pressure as servers turn into commodity products has prompted the major server makers to move into software and services. They are particularly focusing on supplying the technology and expertise to operate corporate data centers more efficiently and with less power. Sometimes they supply computing services to business users much as Google does to consumers, a style of data-center service known as cloud computing.

“For years, Sun has been fighting against the commoditization wave,” Nicholas G. Carr, an industry analyst and author of “The Big Switch,” a book published last year about cloud computing, told The Times. “But building private cloud-computing environments for corporations looks like a much more lucrative business for all the major server companies. That way, they are not just selling generic boxes, but also higher-level engineering, which is more profitable.”

Sun came to the view last year that linking up with another large company would be its best future. That is when its representatives began talking to other companies, including I.B.M., The Times said, citing a person involved in the discussions.

If the companies agree on a bid, an antitrust review will begin. The principal issue, legal experts say, will be how regulators define the server market. Together, I.B.M. and Sun would have about 65 percent of the market for server computers running the Unix operating system and 42 percent of the total server market, measured by the dollar value of the market.

But viewed by numbers of server computers sold, I.B.M. and Sun would have only 18 percent of the market, according to I.D.C., a market research firm. That is because Hewlett-Packard and Dell are the leaders in lower-cost industry-standard servers, which sell in far higher numbers than Unix machines.

Combined, the companies would hold nearly all of the $1-billion-a-year market for specialized robotic systems that handle tape storage for mainframe computers, according to Robert Amatruda, an I.D.C. analyst.

Antitrust enforcement tends to be less rigorous in bad economic times, in the interests of keeping business activity going. But legal experts said that each antitrust merger review is a separate case, based on specific facts.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)4/27/2009 11:06:34 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Qualcomm Gains After Sales Forecast Beats Analysts’ Estimates

By Katie Hoffmann and Ian King

April 27 (Bloomberg) -- Qualcomm Inc., the world’s biggest maker of mobile-phone chips, gained as much as 7.8 percent in Nasdaq trading after saying sales will exceed its targets this year, helped by demand for higher-end handsets.

Revenue this year will be at least $9.85 billion, up from a previous projection of as much as $9.8 billion, the San Diego- based company said today in a statement. That beat the $9.72 billion average of estimates in a Bloomberg survey.

Consumers are buying more advanced phones that surf the Web and send e-mail even as the economy slows, helping sales of Qualcomm’s chips, Chief Executive Officer Paul Jacobs said. New networks for such phones in China are driving sales, said James Faucette, an analyst for Pacific Crest Securities Inc.

“The carriers in China are increasing their promotions of 3G products and services,” said Faucette, who rates the shares “outperform” and doesn’t own any. “As those orders into China start to materialize, that’s resulting in increased demand.”

Qualcomm gained $3.06, or 7.4 percent, to $44.42 in Nasdaq Stock Market trading at 10:26 a.m. New York time, and earlier rose as high as $44.59, the biggest jump in five months. The stock had advanced 15 percent this year before today.

The company also posted a second-quarter loss after booking $748 million in costs related to a legal settlement with Broadcom Corp. Yesterday, the company agreed to pay Broadcom $891 million in cash over four years to end a global dispute over handset-technology patents. Qualcomm said the deal doesn’t affect its licensing-revenue model.

‘Strong’ 3G Demand

Sales this quarter will probably be $2.4 billion to $2.6 billion, Qualcomm said. Analysts had predicted $2.35 billion.

Qualcomm’s technology has grown more popular with the rise of so-called third-generation phones that offer high-speed Web. Unlike other chipmakers, Qualcomm gets most of its profit from licensing its technology, called code division multiple access, or CDMA.

“Worldwide demand for 3G enabled products and services remains strong,” Jacobs said on a conference call. “We continue to see healthy growth in CDMA device shipments, as well as significantly increased demand for our chip sets.”

Demand for 3G phones is picking up in countries such as China and India, where most handset users still have more basic devices, Chief Financial Officer Bill Keitel said in an interview.

The second-quarter net loss was $289 million, or 18 cents a share, compared with a profit $766 million, or 47 cents, a year earlier. Revenue fell 5.8 percent to $2.46 billion in the period, which ended March 29. Analysts had projected a profit of 29 cents a share on sales of $2.35 billion.

Mobile-Phone Slump

Global mobile-phone shipments will drop 8.3 percent this year, with declines as high as 25 percent in markets such as Japan and the U.S., according to IDC. Still, sales of so-called smart phones with high-speed Internet access will grow at 3.4 percent, according to the Framingham, Massachusetts-based researcher.

“The bright spot is smart phones,” said Ashok Kumar, a Collins Stewart analyst in Palo Alto, California. He recommends buying the shares and said he doesn’t own any. He also estimates that overall phone-unit sales dropped 15 percent in the first three months of 2009 from the previous quarter.

Qualcomm surpassed Texas Instruments Inc. last year as the biggest maker of mobile-phone digital signal processors, the key chips in handsets. Texas Instruments last week posted profit and gave a forecast that exceeded analyst predictions. Still, the company also cautioned that demand wasn’t rebounding; its customers are restocking their inventory.

To contact the reporters on this story: Katie Hoffmann in New York at khoffmann4@bloomberg.netIan King in San Francisco at ianking@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: April 27, 2009 10:28 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)4/28/2009 4:19:00 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Technology Stocks Favorites in S&P 500 on Zero Debt (Update3)

By Eric Martin and Michael Tsang

April 27 (Bloomberg) -- Technology companies are piling up cash and cutting debt faster than any other industry, a signal to investors that they will rally even as evidence mounts that the stock market’s fastest advance since 1938 is in jeopardy.

Cisco Systems Inc., Salesforce.com Inc. and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. have driven technology shares in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index to a 16 percent gain in 2009, the best start since 1998 and the most among the 10 industries in the measure. Money managers are betting the cash reserves, rising profits and cheapest valuations on record will send U.S. technology stocks up 24 percent this year, compared with an increase of less than 1 percent for the S&P 500, according to analyst price forecasts and data compiled by Bloomberg.

The S&P 500 fell 0.4 percent last week, the first drop since early March, after bank losses increased and the International Monetary Fund said world economies may contract for another year. MFS Investment Management, Harris Private Bank and Huntington Bancshares Inc. say computer and software makers may climb even as the rest of the market retreats.

“If you are putting money into the market, that’s the first place to look,” said James Swanson, Boston-based chief investment strategist at MFS, which oversees $134 billion. “They have cash on their balance sheets, they don’t have a lot of requirements to pay back debt, and valuations on the stocks are amazingly low. It’s a winner.”

The S&P 500 slipped 1 percent to 857.51 today on concern the swine flu outbreak will hurt travel, energy and hotel companies. Technology stocks in the index lost 0.9 percent.

Most in Cash

Technology companies in the S&P 500 hold 19 percent of their assets in cash on average and have the least debt relative to overall value at 17 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Of the 75 companies in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index, 18 have no borrowings, including Cupertino, California-based Apple Inc., Mountain View, California-based Google Inc. and Qualcomm in San Diego. Among the remaining 425 companies in the index, only 12 have no debt, data show.

Corporate budgets for technology spending will increase in 2010 as equipment updates spur a 5.5 percent rise in computer shipments and a recovery in server sales, UBS AG said in a report to clients dated April 8. The Zurich-based firm’s survey of chief information officers in the U.S. and Europe showed they expect spending to climb after dropping 5.1 percent this year.

Global Recession

Prospects the first global recession since World War II would halt business upgrades and reduce consumer spending sent the technology index down as much as 55 percent from its October 2007 high. The gauge fetched 7.2 times its companies’ average cash flow last month, the lowest level in at least 16 years.

Even as Microsoft Corp. reported its first revenue decline since the company went public in 1986 last week, technology earnings held up better than other industries whose profits rely on economic growth.

Unlike banks, energy producers, retailers, mining companies and phone providers, computer makers in the S&P 500 haven’t lost money on a combined basis in any quarter since the bear market began, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Industrial companies, makers of consumer staples, utilities and health-care providers also haven’t posted deficits.

A prolonged recession may delay a recovery in consumer and business spending and cause the rally in technology stocks to unravel, according to Stephanie Giroux, chief investment strategist for TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., an Omaha, Nebraska- based online brokerage with $225 billion in client assets.

IMF Forecast

The Washington-based IMF said in a forecast released April 22 that the world economy will shrink 1.3 percent this year, compared with its January projection of 0.5 percent growth. The lender predicted expansion of 1.9 percent next year instead of its earlier 3 percent estimate.

The contraction, which has already thrown 5.1 million Americans out of work, will push the U.S. jobless rate to 9.5 percent by year-end, economists surveyed by Bloomberg predict. Analysts who say corporate America will halt nine quarters of profit declines by the end of the year have proven to be too optimistic in every period since the third quarter of 2007, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“The rally is reflecting a more bullish economic recovery than is likely to pan out,” said TD Ameritrade’s Giroux. “You have to be careful about some of these sectors that have run too far, too fast.”

Technology companies will benefit more as the economy emerges from $1.34 trillion in global bank losses and the highest unemployment rate in 25 years when businesses spend on equipment to make up for fired workers, according to Genesis Asset Management’s Michael Williams.

‘At The Dock’

Companies excluding banks, brokerages and insurers in the Russell 3000, which represents 98 percent of the value of U.S. stocks, have a combined $787 billion of cash, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s twice the level at the end of the last bear market in 2002. They will use some of it to buy computers and make acquisitions, Williams said.

“We believe tech is leaving everybody at the dock,” said Williams, who oversees about $880 million as chief executive officer of Genesis Asset in New York. “We were aggressive, aggressive buyers. No one has liked technology for so long you’d be hard-pressed to remember there was a bubble 10 years ago.”

Williams said the firm owns shares of Cisco, the world’s biggest maker of networking equipment.

Cisco Shares

Shares of San Jose, California-based Cisco climbed 15 percent in March, when it traded at 6.4 times cash flow. That was the lowest valuation ever and 59 percent less than the five- year average, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Salesforce.com added 25 percent this year as the world’s largest seller of Internet-based customer-management software said fourth-quarter earnings rose 86 percent and predicted full- year profit growth that beat analysts’ estimates.

The San Francisco-based company, which delivers its programs to subscribers online, has no debt and cash reserves that account for 33 percent of its assets. That’s the second- highest ratio among S&P 500 software suppliers.

“As companies need to economize and improve their operations, technology is a logical choice,” said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Chicago-based Harris Private Bank, which oversees $60 billion. “They view that they’ll get a return from their investment.”

Cognizant’s Cash

Cognizant is the only S&P 500 company that has at least 30 percent of its assets in cash, a stock price that’s less than 15 times estimated 2009 profit and is expected to earn more this year than it did in the previous 12 months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The company, which sells on-site computer support, hasn’t had a decline in quarterly earnings since going public in 1998. First-quarter profit will rise 14 percent when it reports next month, analysts’ estimates show.

While shares of Teaneck, New Jersey-based Cognizant have climbed 27 percent this year, the average price forecast from analysts shows the stock will rise 19 percent in the next 12 months.

Technology makers are using cash to fund acquisitions and expand into new businesses. Cisco CEO John Chambers said in February he plans to use the company’s $29.5 billion in cash, the most of any U.S. technology company, to add product lines. He’s pushing into the market for data centers, the rooms of computers that store information and files, to boost sales.

Technology Takeovers

Sun Microsystems Inc., located in Santa Clara, California, has more than doubled this year after Redwood City, California- based Oracle Corp. agreed to buy the server maker for $7.4 billion. Sun shares dropped 79 percent in 2008.

Debt-free Broadcom Corp., a maker of semiconductors for headsets and televisions, offered $764 million for Emulex Corp., a provider of chips for data centers.

That raised the odds Cisco or Sunnyvale, California-based Juniper Networks Inc. will bid for QLogic Corp., a rival of Emulex, Morgan Keegan Inc. said. Costa Mesa, California-based Emulex gained 47 percent on April 21 following the offer. QLogic, located in Aliso Viejo, California, added 19 percent.

“The values are certainly there,” said Randy Bateman, chief investment officer at the asset management unit of Huntington Bancshares, which oversees $13 billion. “The more cash you’ve got on hand, the better off you will be.”

Bateman’s firm bought Cisco and Armonk, New York-based International Business Machines Corp. because they may benefit from acquiring smaller companies at bargain prices.

Hedge Funds

Some of the world’s biggest hedge funds have taken notice. Westport, Connecticut-based Bridgewater Associates Inc. bought a stake in Cisco. Steven Cohen’s Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC Capital Advisors LLC bought more Salesforce.com stock. Lee Ainslie’s Maverick Capital Ltd. in New York lifted shareholdings in Cognizant at the end of 2008, SEC filings show. The three hedge funds manage more than $50 billion.

The last time the technology index started a year with a bigger rally, it continued. The measure rose 29 percent in 1998 through April 24 and went on to climb another 38 percent. The gauge surged 16-fold during the 1990s before peaking in March 2000 and then plunging 83 percent through October 2002.

The advance a decade ago was spurred by the likes of Pets.com Inc., which closed after burning through cash raised in its 2000 initial public offering in less than a year, and GeoCities, a Web-site hosting company that Yahoo! Inc. bought in 1999 and said last week it would shut. Investors say the current rise is different because it’s being driven by mature businesses with little or no debt.

“Technology has come to the forefront, and we believe the answer is low leverage,” said Richard Weiss, who oversees about $50 billion as chief investment officer at City National Bank in Beverly Hills, California. “The lack of debt problems, liquidity problems is allowing them to do things that other companies and industries may not be able to do.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Eric Martin in New York at emartin21@bloomberg.net; Michael Tsang in New York at mtsang1@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: April 27, 2009 17:46 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)5/7/2009 12:16:28 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Hewlett-Packard’s Hurd May Hunt for More Acquisitions

By Connie Guglielmo

May 7 (Bloomberg) -- Hewlett-Packard Co. may hunt for acquisitions to expand its networking business, a bid to counter Cisco Systems Inc.’s offensive in the market for computer servers.

Potential targets include NetApp Inc., Brocade Communications Systems Inc. and Juniper Networks Inc., said Shaw Wu, an analyst at Kaufman Brothers. Those companies would help Chief Executive Officer Mark Hurd expand Hewlett-Packard’s ProCurve networking business. Cisco, meanwhile, is moving into the market for computer servers used in corporate data centers.

“With Cisco entering the server space, they basically declared war on each other,” said San Francisco-based Wu, who recommends buying Hewlett-Packard shares. “H-P has a decent networking business already with ProCurve. It makes sense they’d want to grow that.”

The challenge for Hurd is adding to Hewlett-Packard’s $118 billion in annual sales amid the sharpest slump in personal- computer demand in history. PC shipments, which account for about a third of Hewlett-Packard’s revenue, may drop 12 percent this year, and total worldwide technology spending may fall 3.8 percent to $3.2 trillion, according to research firm Gartner Inc.

“They have to grow through acquisitions because it’s just difficult to move the needle when you have almost $120 billion in revenue,” said Shannon Cross, an analyst at Cross Research Group LLC in Livingston, New Jersey. “They’re very competent in buying companies and integrating them into their businesses.”

Hewlett-Packard already expanded its computer-services business last year with the $13.2 billion takeover of Electronic Data Systems.

Servers, Networks

Companies worldwide spent $53.1 billion on computer servers in 2008, with Hewlett-Packard the No. 2 in the market behind International Business Machines Corp., according to Gartner. The market for switches, the kind of networking gear most often bought by companies, was almost $19 billion last year, with Cisco accounting for more than 70 percent of sales, according to the Dell’Oro Group, a research firm in Redwood City, California.

Hurd, 52, said in March at an investor conference that Hewlett-Packard will take a “disciplined” approach to acquisitions. The company has bought 31 companies since Hurd took over as CEO in 2005, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

David Shane, a spokesman for Palo Alto, California-based Hewlett-Packard, declined to comment on possible takeover targets. John Noh, a spokesman for San Jose, California-based Brocade, also declined to comment, as did Juniper’s Melanie Branon and NetApp’s Eric Brown. NetApp CEO Daniel Warmenhoven said in an interview in March that he wants the Sunnyvale, California-based company to remain independent.

Unified Computing System

Cisco will step up competition with Hewlett-Packard next month when it introduces a “Unified Computing System” that includes server computers and networking gear for data centers.

“H-P will be a competitor, but just one of a number we face,” Cisco Chief Executive Officer John Chambers said yesterday in an interview. “There’s a huge transition going on, with a new category -- which is really the network combining with storage, combining with servers, and combining with software.”

Software Targets

Hewlett-Packard dropped $1.39, or 3.8 percent, to $34.94 at 11:33 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares were little changed this year before today. Cisco lost 66 cents to $18.95.

A takeover of NetApp, Brocade or Juniper would let Hewlett- Packard gain customers and broaden the range of networking gear in its ProCurve unit. NetApp sells storage devices that can be linked together over a network, while Brocade makes the switches needed to route data across storage networks. Juniper is the second-largest maker of networking gear after Cisco.

Another area Hewlett-Packard may consider is software, especially programs used for corporate functions and to run data centers, Wu said. The challenge is that takeovers such as Oracle Corp.’s $8.5 billion purchase of BEA Systems Inc. last year and Hewlett-Packard’s $1.6 billion buyout of Opsware Inc. in 2007 have eliminated many of the biggest candidates, he said.

Among the possible targets is BMC Software Inc., UBS AG analysts wrote in a March 23 note. BMC, based in Houston, makes software that controls servers in data centers, a market that Hewlett-Packard and IBM are going after. Mark Stouse, a spokesman for BMC, declined to comment.

Software is one of Hewlett-Packard’s most profitable divisions, with an operating margin of about 16 percent in the quarter ended in January. By contrast, the PC business had a margin of 5 percent.

Hurd’s biggest transaction was last year’s takeover of EDS, the world’s second-largest computer services provider after IBM. Hewlett-Packard said in February that the integration of EDS is ahead of plan.

Sam Wilson, an analyst at JMP Securities in San Francisco, said Hewlett-Packard is likely to get more aggressive as it fights off Cisco in the data-center market.

“H-P clearly is going to be a competitor” to Cisco, Wilson said. “The gloves are off.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Connie Guglielmo in San Francisco at cguglielmo1@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: May 7, 2009 11:36 EDT



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2563)5/7/2009 12:57:11 PM
From: ggamer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
I hope Mike Buckely is OK. His last post was in Jan of 2008.

Here is a post from Slacker regarding QCOM that I wanted to share with you all and get your opinion:

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (5137) 5/6/2009 9:08:23 PM
From: slacker711 4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 5161

The fact that the baseband supplier community is consolidating, with at least two of the largest suppliers (Texas Instruments & Freescale) exiting the baseband market. Merrill wrote in 2008- “We see several potentially significant opportunities over the next one to two years for QCOM to increase its share in the WCDMA” . Further, Credit Suisse estimates that NOK accounted for about $1.8 bill of TIs $3.4 bill in wireless revenues, writing ---“Even assuming QCOM gains 50% of NOK’s wireless business from TI gradually, which we believe could be conservative, this could mean as much as a further $900 mn revenue opportunity in the long run….”

I do believe that Qualcomm is going to continue gain share for the next couple of years and should move from their current 40% or so of WCDMA chipsets to something above 50%. However, beyond that range, they are going to be fighting a couple of trends.

One is that the baseband is becoming a commodity. There was once quite a bit of differentiation between WCDMA basebands. If you read handset message boards in 2004, there were constant comparisons between WCDMA handsets for size, talk/standby times, and RF performance. For the most part, that is long gone, and the discussion has transitioned to features supported by the applications processor. The WCDMA baseband has essentially met the performance requirements for most consumers, which means that differentiation now comes mostly from price. QCT should be able to maintain their margins on the low-end for the next year or two due to their lead in single-chip basebands, but that technical lead wont last forever. They are going to be competing on an equal playing field in the out years with competitors with drastically lower cost structures and gross margin requirements. What Mediatek did to GSM is eventually going to be done with WCDMA as well.

The 2nd barrier for further share gains is simply going to be the preference of handset vendors to avoid a situation similar ot the PC industry. If you look at CDMA handsets, there is far less variation in specs than in GSM/WCDMA due to the fact that Qualcomm supplies 90% of the chipsets. Look at how many 2 and 3 megapixel cameraphones HTC, Samsung, and LG have released. That was a limitation set by the MSM7xxx series. The handset vendors couldnt distinguish their handsets based on specs since all of them were working from the same platform. As Qualcomm approaches 50%, this will become an increasing factor in handset vendors decisions on how much business to give to chipset providers other than Qualcomm. It is in their long-term best interest to make sure that STM, Broadcom, and Infineon survive. I believe that it is extremely unlikely that Nokia will ever give Q 50% of their business....to do so would be to follow down the path of the white box makers in the PC industry. You can see from Nokia's multiple vendor strategy that they will do everything to avoid that fate. Long-term margins for the handset vendors depend on differentiation....and that means insuring that there continue to be multiple suppliers of chipsets.

Without continuing share gains, the ASP pressures will evenutally pressure revenues. That is why I see Snapdragon as being so key to Qualcomm. It allows the possibility to open up entire new markets where Q is the low-cost provider attacking Intel (instead of the high-margin provider being attacked by Broadcom, Mediatek etc.).

What does it take to get to ~ $100 / share (about a 15% CAGR for 5 years). And, how can a 15% CAGR be achieved-

Honestly, I had thought you would have been looking for higher returns. I wont argue that 15% isnt possible, only that the bulk of the return is likely to come in the next two years or so.

I do believe that there is likely quite a bit Q could do on the expense side of the equation to continue delivering outsized returns beyond the next two years....however, I dont believe that this management team is geared up for that kind of discipline. They are still swinging for the fences hoping that one of their many wireless ventures will deliver the results necessary to move the revenue needle at Qualcomm. It might be a decent strategy if they had a better track record of delivering, but management has been abysmal along these lines. It is virtually impossible to have faith that they are going do a better job this time.

Slacker

Message 25626387