SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (34196)3/19/2009 7:54:26 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Show me the ruling and I will believe you. Ruling are a matter of public record. Certainly you can cite a reference to public record to prove your assertion.

All I know is that the SCOTUS elected not to review the Berg case against usurper Obama. That is not a ruling. It could well be with the full knowledge that Obama is not qualified and the choice to not create the potential for pandemonium.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (34196)3/24/2009 2:20:04 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
I believe Buddy that the cases were dismissed for lack of standing and never really got to the merits as to Obama's status. So I understand the feelings of Mr. Dierks and others who believe Obama is not qualified but I also believe the law must be respected and the time for such challenges has long expired....


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News