Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RWS who wrote (61405)	3/18/2009 12:02:33 PM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224750

There are no such savings to account for, at least no significant savings. There might be additional costs just from the factors you note (and their would obviously be additional costs overall). If replacement employees are cheaper they save money, at least they would allow for a more flexible labor force which saves money. More union activity might mean more need for lawyers and security. Most employees don't have any hours of anti-union meetings, and to the extent the tactic is used, giving unions more advantages might increase its use.